Planning cells and citizen juries in environmental policy: Deliberation and its limits

    Research output: Chapter in Book or Conference Publication/ProceedingChapterpeer-review

    16 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This chapter considers whether citizen juries are likely to encourage better environmental policy decisions. The chief argument presented here is that they achieve a type of deliberation over policy options which is valuable because it forces engagement between the views, values and information of ordinary citizen with those of policy experts or other 'insiders'. However, more ambitious claims for citizen juries must be balanced against their apparent institutional fragility, and related weaknesses. Consideration of the background of the citizen jury idea is briefly given here, followed by discussion of some comparative experiences with citizen juries. This is followed by a more in-depth and critical evaluation of a trial citizen jury on waste policy held in Ireland, which the author administered.

    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationPublic Participation and Better Environmental Decisions
    Subtitle of host publicationThe Promise and Limits of Participatory Processes for the Quality of Environmentally Related Decision-making
    PublisherSpringer Netherlands
    Pages57-71
    Number of pages15
    ISBN (Print)9781402093241
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2009

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Planning cells and citizen juries in environmental policy: Deliberation and its limits'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this