Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Planning cells and citizen juries in environmental policy: Deliberation and its limits

Research output: Chapter in Book or Conference Publication/ProceedingChapterpeer-review

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This chapter considers whether citizen juries are likely to encourage better environmental policy decisions. The chief argument presented here is that they achieve a type of deliberation over policy options which is valuable because it forces engagement between the views, values and information of ordinary citizen with those of policy experts or other 'insiders'. However, more ambitious claims for citizen juries must be balanced against their apparent institutional fragility, and related weaknesses. Consideration of the background of the citizen jury idea is briefly given here, followed by discussion of some comparative experiences with citizen juries. This is followed by a more in-depth and critical evaluation of a trial citizen jury on waste policy held in Ireland, which the author administered.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationPublic Participation and Better Environmental Decisions
Subtitle of host publicationThe Promise and Limits of Participatory Processes for the Quality of Environmentally Related Decision-making
PublisherSpringer Netherlands
Pages57-71
Number of pages15
ISBN (Print)9781402093241
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Planning cells and citizen juries in environmental policy: Deliberation and its limits'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this