Abstract
Executive summary
This research
The PLACES Project - Pregnancy Loss in Workplaces: Informing policymakers on support mechanisms - was funded by the Department of Children, Equality,
Disability, Integration and Youth, and conducted by researchers from University College Cork and University of Galway between September 2022 and September 2023. The aim of this project was to examine the workplace experiences of pregnancy loss before 24 weeks gestation, and to identify relevant needed supports.
Background
Pregnancy loss affects approximately one in every four pregnancies, most often before 12 completed weeks of pregnancy. Pregnancy loss at any gestation can have physical impacts on the pregnant woman, and emotional and social impacts on the woman and her partner. Most women of reproductive age are in paid employment; as such, workplaces are an important context to consider in pregnancy loss experiences. In the Republic of Ireland, women are entitled to maternity leave of six months duration if they experience a stillbirth after 24 weeks of pregnancy. There is no statutory leave entitlement for pregnancy loss before this time.
Methods
This project drew on a number of methods to gain a broad and deep
understanding of workplace experiences of pregnancy loss. This included a search for relevant research; a review of international statutory leave for pregnancy loss; a sample of pregnancy loss policies across companies in the Republic of Ireland; a national mixed-method survey with 913 participants responses included; and a
qualitative interview study with 13 participants.
Key findings
There is a significant gap between the needs of individuals who experience
pregnancy loss and the supports available to them in workplaces. This has an
impact on the wellbeing of individuals, their physical and emotional recovery
from pregnancy loss, and their return to work.
Most women across high-income countries, including the Republic of Ireland, are
without leave entitlements or legal protection which would enable them to take
PLACES | Pregnancy Loss (under 24 weeks) in Workplaces: Informing policymakers on support mechanisms
viii
sufficient leave from work following a pregnancy loss. Women who experience
termination of pregnancy, or partners of the woman experiencing the loss, are
even less likely to be entitled to time off work. As such, most individuals rely on
sick leave or other general leave entitlements to take time off work.
Some individual companies or countries across the world provide leave
specifically for early pregnancy loss. Among these policies, there is huge variation
regarding who is eligible for this leave, or how long this leave from work is.
Our findings suggest that most women need leave from work. The amount of
leave needed depends on a variety of factors, including the physical impact or
clinical management of the loss; the gestation of the pregnancy; and personal
factors such as history of recurrent loss or emotional response to the pregnancy
loss. Women who experience termination of pregnancy, similarly, require time
from work, to recover from the physical process, and sometimes the emotional
effects, particularly those who experience termination of pregnancy for medical
reasons. Partners also need some leave from work, in order to support the woman
who has lost the pregnancy, and to deal with their own loss.
Our primary research suggests that there is still a level of secrecy and stigma
attached to pregnancy loss, especially earlier losses and termination of pregnancy.
This can prevent people sharing their loss or seeking support, particularly in the
workplace. Participants across the international literature and in our primary
research often described fear of dismissal from work, or discrimination regarding
career progression. Indeed, some individuals internationally, and in the Republic
of Ireland, did face dismissal or sidelining for promotions as a result of their
absence or decreased productivity following pregnancy loss.
Within workplaces, individuals, and particularly managers, are often uninformed
about pregnancy loss and ill-equipped to support workers during these
experiences. This very often led to negative workplace experiences following
pregnancy loss. These experiences include a lack of empathy and support; harsh
treatment regarding absence or workload; insensitive comments and questions;
and distressing exchanges in the workplace. Across the literature, and our primary
research, a small number of individuals left their employment due to their
experiences following pregnancy loss.
Policy implications
Based on the above findings, we put forward the following recommendations:
PLACES | Pregnancy Loss (under 24 weeks) in Workplaces: Informing policymakers on support mechanisms
ix
Recommendation 1
A statutory right to paid leave should be introduced for pre-viability pregnancy
loss, regardless of the gestational stage or the reason for the loss. This should be
subject to medical certification. This would play two roles: first it would allow for a
period of recovery, and second it would show societal recognition of the impact of
pre-viability pregnancy loss.
Recommendation 2
Any leave introduced should be of sufficient duration to meet the needs of those
affected, which are presented in this report.
In the other jurisdictions examined, the model of pregnancy loss leave introduced
was influenced by the existing statutory leave frameworks, all of which are more
generous than in the Republic of Ireland. The duration and scope of any leave in
the Republic of Ireland would have to be considered in the context of existing
statutory paid leave provision. Current statutory paid sick leave is three days (to be
increased to 10 days by 2026), while the statutory entitlement to leave following a
stillbirth after 24 weeks of pregnancy is 26 weeks maternity leave. Payment of
maternity benefit is subject to having the requisite PRSI contributions, and there
is no statutory entitlement to receive payment from the employer while on
maternity leave, although employers can choose to pay employees while on
maternity leave. The needs of people experiencing pre-viability pregnancy loss will
vary, and any statutory provisions introduced will need to have regard to this.
Recommendation 3
A statutory right to paid leave for pregnancy loss should also be introduced for
partners. According to international literature and the findings of primary research
detailed in this report, this leave is needed in order to process their own loss and
to support their partner (including the care of any children).
Recommendation 4
If, in accordance with the recommendation above, statutory paid pregnancy loss
leave is introduced, it should be added to the list of family care-related leaves
which are covered by the Unfair Dismissals Act. The statutory wording introducing
any such leave should also make clear that such leave is covered by equality law
and less favourable treatment on the basis of taking such leave is prohibited
under the gender ground as a pregnancy-related issue.
PLACES | Pregnancy Loss (under 24 weeks) in Workplaces: Informing policymakers on support mechanisms
x
If statutory paid pregnancy loss leave is not introduced, then guidance should be
issued to employers to clarify that any less favourable treatment of an individual
for taking existing leave entitlements following pregnancy loss is covered by the
provisions of employment equality legislation and would amount to
discrimination on the gender ground as a pregnancy related issue.
Recommendation 5
Given the individuality of each persons experience of pregnancy loss, patient and
public involvement in the development of policies and practices which promote
positive workplace cultures and environments is recommended.
Recommendation 6
The implementation of leave entitlements should be carefully considered by
workplaces. Procedures on notification, submitting certification, and requesting
leave should be developed with sensitivity to the needs of individuals
experiencing pregnancy loss. This includes considering the need for privacy and
compassion, as well as allowing reasonable time to notify the employer.
Recommendation 7
Additional supports and accommodations should be made available to workers
experiencing pregnancy loss. An organisational framework, including policies and
practices regarding how to support employees experiencing pregnancy loss,
clearly outlining the organisational ethos positioning regarding this issue and
highlighting the different measures and supports available to staff, should be a
priority in organisations.
For this purpose, clear guidance should be provided, by relevant Government
Departments, to organisations on how to develop and implement such
frameworks, encouraging each employer to apply and adjust these to their
workplace contexts in the most suitable way.
Further to Recommendation 5, involvement of individuals with lived experience of
pregnancy loss and relevant stakeholders (e.g. external organisations and
individuals groups specialised in this issue) is essential for an adequate
development of policies and practices in this field, as well as their successful
implementation.
PLACES | Pregnancy Loss (under 24 weeks) in Workplaces: Informing policymakers on support mechanisms
xi
Recommendation 8
Information about leave and support entitlements for pre viability pregnancy loss
needs to be clear, publicly available and accessible, to ensure that individuals can
easily inform themselves about these, and avail of such supports when needed.
Recommendation 9
Political leadership is needed to drive changes in public awareness and
perceptions surrounding pregnancy loss in general, and specifically relating to
workplaces and how to support workers in this regard. This requires various
actions, such as the inclusion of education around pregnancy loss as part of
overall sexual and reproductive health education within schools, antenatal
curricula, and through other channels settings, and in national policies and action
plans (across all Government Departments, including Health; Children, Equality,
Disability, Integration and Youth; Education; Enterprise, Trade and Employment;
Justice; Social Protection)
| Original language | English (Ireland) |
|---|---|
| Publication status | Published - 1 Jan 2024 |
Authors (Note for portal: view the doc link for the full list of authors)
- Authors
- Kelly-Harrington, R; Hennessy, M; Leitao, S; Donnelly, M; Murray, C; O¿Sullivan, M; Dalton-O¿Connor, C; Nuzum, D; O¿Donoghue, K