Performance of the resolute zotarolimus-eluting stent in small vessels

Ronald Caputo, Martin Leon, Patrick Serruys, Franz Josef Neumann, Alan Yeung, Stephan Windecker, Jorge A. Belardi, Sigmund Silber, Ian Meredith, Petr Widimský, Shigeru Saito, Laura Mauri

Research output: Contribution to a Journal (Peer & Non Peer)Articlepeer-review

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background Drug eluting stents for the treatment of small vessel coronary artery disease have traditionally yielded inferior clinical outcomes compared to the use of DES in large vessels. The benefit of the second-generation Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stent (R-ZES) in small vessels was examined. Methods Two-year clinical outcomes from five combined R-ZES studies were compared between patients with small (reference vessel diameter [RVD] ≤2.5 mm; n = 1,956) and large (RVD >2.5 mm; n = 3174) vessels. Results Despite a higher incidence of comorbidities in the small vessel group, there was no significant difference in target lesion failure (TLF) (10.1% vs. 8.7%; P = 0.54) at 2 years. When the subgroup of patients with diabetes was examined (n = 1,553) there was no significant difference in 2-year TLF in small compared to large vessels (11.2% vs. 11.1%; P = 0.17). Similarly, within the small vessel cohort, no significant difference was seen regarding TLF at 2 years between people with and without diabetes (11.2% vs 9.6%; P = 0.28). Conclusion When used for the treatment of small vessels, the R-ZES appears to provide acceptable clinical results at 2 years when compared to its performance in large vessels.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)17-23
Number of pages7
JournalCatheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
Volume84
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2014
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • coronary artery disease
  • diabetes
  • drug eluting stent
  • small vessel disease

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Performance of the resolute zotarolimus-eluting stent in small vessels'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this