Patient perceptions on lipoprotein(a) testing and treatment for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease: results from the INTERASPIRE study in seven countries across five World Health Organization regions

  • Catriona Sian Jennings
  • , Eanna Kenny
  • , Dirk De Bacquer
  • , Jaimini Cegla
  • , Kausik Kumar Ray
  • , John-Paul Corry
  • , Agnieszka Adamska
  • , Kornelia Kotseva
  • , John W McEvoy
  • , Chris Noone
  • , Sandra Ganly
  • , Juwairia Alali
  • , Wael Al Mahmeed
  • , Nooshin Bazargani
  • , Junbo Ge
  • , Rose Hui-Chin Jong
  • , Diana Hui-Ping Foo
  • , Yong Huo
  • , Paula Luna Bonilla
  • , Nancy Xinrong Ji
  • Piotr Jankowski, Yong Li, Amam Mbakwem, Lilian Kagure Mbau, Okechukwu Samuel Ogah, Elijah N Ogola, Adalberto Elias Quintero-Baiz, Mahmoud Umar Sani, Miguel A Urina-Triana, Renata Wolfshaut-Wolak, Ahmad Syadi Mahmood Zuhdi, David Allan Wood

Research output: Contribution to a Journal (Peer & Non Peer)Articlepeer-review

Abstract

AIMS: Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], an inherited lipoprotein, was measured in patients with coronary disease participating in the INTERASPIRE study. The aim of this study was to survey patients' knowledge and perceptions of cardiovascular risk and their views on Lp(a) testing, consequences, and treatment.

METHODS AND RESULTS: In seven participating countries, recruited patients were divided into those with elevated Lp(a) [≥ 50 mg/dL (≥115 mmol/L)] and those with normal levels. In the elevated group, patients were given an educational leaflet about Lp(a), advised to see their physician and subsequently attended a telephone interview that included study-specific questionnaires assessing knowledge, risk perception, and interest in and acceptability of Lp(a) testing. A random sample of patients with normal Lp(a) were interviewed in the same way. Eight hundred fifty-six patients were interviewed, 523 (22.6% female) with normal Lp(a) and 333 (29.1% female) with elevated Lp(a). Knowledge of cardiovascular disease (CVD) was similar in both groups with a score of 62.1% in normal Lp(a) and 59.6 in elevated Lp(a) P = 0.073. Knowledge of Lp(a) and its management in both groups was poor. Patients with elevated Lp(a) were worried by their result but found testing acceptable and appreciated the benefits. They were motivated to reduce their risk of CVD despite the absence of medical therapies and were eager to receive advice.

CONCLUSION: Health professionals working in CVD care should be aware of the need to investigate patients with coronary disease for Lp(a) and be equipped to give advice on how to reduce overall cardiovascular risk especially given the absence of licenced therapies to treat Lp(a).

Original languageEnglish
JournalEuropean Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 29 Aug 2025
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Patient perceptions on lipoprotein(a) testing and treatment for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease: results from the INTERASPIRE study in seven countries across five World Health Organization regions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this