TY - JOUR
T1 - Optimisation of percutaneous coronary intervention
T2 - indispensables for bioresorbable scaffolds
AU - Tenekecioglu, Erhan
AU - Bourantas, Christos V.
AU - Abdelghani, Mohammad
AU - Sotomi, Yohei
AU - Suwannasom, Pannipa
AU - Tateishi, Hiroki
AU - Onuma, Yoshinobu
AU - Yılmaz, Mustafa
AU - Serruys, Patrick W.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2016/9/1
Y1 - 2016/9/1
N2 - Introduction: With new developments in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), such as the introduction of bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS), percutaneous treatment of coronary artery diseases has entered a new era. Without metallic remnants, BRSs appear able to overcome several limitations of the existing metallic stents and provide a physiologic treatment of coronary artery pathology. Areas covered: BRS have different mechanical properties compared to the traditional metallic stents that should be taken into account during their implantation. Lesion selection, device sizing and satisfied pre-dilatation should be implemented prudently. Although intravascular imaging is not mandatory for the implantation of BRSs it may have a value in optimizing device deployment assess final results and reduce the risk of device related adverse events such as re-stenosis, or scaffold thrombosis. This review aims to reveal the crucial points about the methods of optimization in each steps of BRS implantation. Expert commentary: The target lesions for BRS should be selected meticulously. Pre-dilatation, post-dilatation and intra-vascular imaging techniques should be implemented appropriately to avoid undesirable events after scaffold implantation.
AB - Introduction: With new developments in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), such as the introduction of bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS), percutaneous treatment of coronary artery diseases has entered a new era. Without metallic remnants, BRSs appear able to overcome several limitations of the existing metallic stents and provide a physiologic treatment of coronary artery pathology. Areas covered: BRS have different mechanical properties compared to the traditional metallic stents that should be taken into account during their implantation. Lesion selection, device sizing and satisfied pre-dilatation should be implemented prudently. Although intravascular imaging is not mandatory for the implantation of BRSs it may have a value in optimizing device deployment assess final results and reduce the risk of device related adverse events such as re-stenosis, or scaffold thrombosis. This review aims to reveal the crucial points about the methods of optimization in each steps of BRS implantation. Expert commentary: The target lesions for BRS should be selected meticulously. Pre-dilatation, post-dilatation and intra-vascular imaging techniques should be implemented appropriately to avoid undesirable events after scaffold implantation.
KW - Bioresorbable scaffold
KW - intracoronary imaging
KW - intravascular ultrasound
KW - optical coherence tomography
KW - optimal stent implantation
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84983445043
U2 - 10.1080/14779072.2016.1208084
DO - 10.1080/14779072.2016.1208084
M3 - Review article
C2 - 27376592
AN - SCOPUS:84983445043
SN - 1477-9072
VL - 14
SP - 1053
EP - 1070
JO - Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy
JF - Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy
IS - 9
ER -