Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Open issues in transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Part 2: Procedural issues and outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation

  • Jeroen J. Bax
  • , Victoria Delgado
  • , Vinayak Bapat
  • , Helmut Baumgartner
  • , Jean P. Collet
  • , Raimund Erbel
  • , Christian Hamm
  • , Arie P. Kappetein
  • , Jonathon Leipsic
  • , Martin B. Leon
  • , Philip MacCarthy
  • , Nicolo Piazza
  • , Philippe Pibarot
  • , William C. Roberts
  • , Josep Rodés-Cabau
  • , Patrick W. Serruys
  • , Martyn Thomas
  • , Alec Vahanian
  • , John Webb
  • , Jose Luis Zamorano
  • Stephan Windecker
  • Leiden University Medical Center
  • St Thomas' Hospital
  • University Hospital Muenster Albert-Schweitzer-Campus
  • AP-HP Groupe Hospitalier Pitié—Salpêtrière
  • University Clinics
  • Kerckhoff Heart Center
  • Erasmus MC
  • University of British Columbia
  • Columbia University Medical Center
  • King's College Hospital
  • McGill University
  • Cardiovascular Surgery
  • Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Québec
  • Baylor University Medical Center at Dallas
  • Université Laval
  • Paris Diderot Sorbonne Cite University
  • Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal
  • University Hospital of Psychiatry

Research output: Contribution to a Journal (Peer & Non Peer)Review articlepeer-review

105 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article provides an overviewon procedure-related issues and uncertainties in outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). The different access sites and how to select them in an individual patient are discussed. Also, the occurrence and potential predictors of aortic regurgitation (AR) after TAVI are addressed. The different methods to quantify AR are reviewed, and it appears that accurate and reproducible quantification is suboptimal. Complications such as prosthesis-patient mismatch and conduction abnormalities (and need for permanent pacemaker) are discussed, as well as cerebrovascular events, which emphasize the development of optimal anti-coagulative strategies. Finally, recent registries haveshownthe adoption ofTAVI in the real world, but longer follow-up studies are needed to evaluate the outcome (but also prosthesis durability). Additionally, future studies are briefly discussed, which will address the use of TAVI in pure AR and lower-risk patients.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2639-2654
Number of pages16
JournalEuropean Heart Journal
Volume35
Issue number38
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 7 Oct 2014
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Access site
  • Aortic regurgitation
  • Complications
  • Registries
  • Transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Open issues in transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Part 2: Procedural issues and outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this