Official Indifference and Persistent Procrastination: An Analysis of Sinnott

Shivaun Quinlivan; Mary Keys

doi:10.13025/23258

Official Indifference and Persistent Procrastination: An Analysis of Sinnott

Shivaun Quinlivan
, Mary Keys

Law

Research output: Contribution to a Journal (Peer & Non Peer) › Article › peer-review

3 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The Supreme Court decision in Sinnott v. Minister for Education, 1 though predictable, resulted in widespread disappointment among disability groups and families of people with disabilities. By a majority of six to one, the Supreme Court decision overturned the High Court, which had granted the right to primary education on the basis of need rather than age, and confirmed that the right to primary education ends at 18 years.

Original language	English (Ireland)
Journal	Judicial Studies Institute Journal
Volume	2
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.13025/23258
Publication status	Published - 1 Jan 2002

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

SDG 4 Quality Education

Keywords

Disability
Law
Right to Education
School of Law

Access to Document

10.13025/23258Licence: CC BY

Official-indifference-and-persistent-procrastination-an-analysis-of-sinnottAccepted author manuscript, 87.2 KBLicence: CC BY

Cite this

@article{35f4b47eeabd445b9d60b31786abd518,

title = "Official Indifference and Persistent Procrastination: An Analysis of Sinnott",

abstract = "The Supreme Court decision in Sinnott v. Minister for Education, 1 though predictable, resulted in widespread disappointment among disability groups and families of people with disabilities. By a majority of six to one, the Supreme Court decision overturned the High Court, which had granted the right to primary education on the basis of need rather than age, and confirmed that the right to primary education ends at 18 years.",

keywords = "Disability, Law, Right to Education, School of Law",

author = "Shivaun Quinlivan and Mary Keys",

year = "2002",

month = jan,

day = "1",

doi = "10.13025/23258",

language = "English (Ireland)",

volume = "2",

journal = "Judicial Studies Institute Journal",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Official Indifference and Persistent Procrastination: An Analysis of Sinnott

AU - Quinlivan, Shivaun

AU - Keys, Mary

PY - 2002/1/1

Y1 - 2002/1/1

N2 - The Supreme Court decision in Sinnott v. Minister for Education, 1 though predictable, resulted in widespread disappointment among disability groups and families of people with disabilities. By a majority of six to one, the Supreme Court decision overturned the High Court, which had granted the right to primary education on the basis of need rather than age, and confirmed that the right to primary education ends at 18 years.

AB - The Supreme Court decision in Sinnott v. Minister for Education, 1 though predictable, resulted in widespread disappointment among disability groups and families of people with disabilities. By a majority of six to one, the Supreme Court decision overturned the High Court, which had granted the right to primary education on the basis of need rather than age, and confirmed that the right to primary education ends at 18 years.

KW - Disability

KW - Law

KW - Right to Education

KW - School of Law

UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10379/7064

U2 - 10.13025/23258

DO - 10.13025/23258

M3 - Article

VL - 2

JO - Judicial Studies Institute Journal

JF - Judicial Studies Institute Journal

IS - 2

ER -

Official Indifference and Persistent Procrastination: An Analysis of Sinnott

Abstract

UN SDGs

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this