Off-Pump Versus On-Pump Bypass Surgery for Left Main Coronary Artery Disease

  • Umberto Benedetto
  • , John Puskas
  • , Arie Pieter Kappetein
  • , W. Morris Brown
  • , Ferenc Horkay
  • , Piet W. Boonstra
  • , G. Bogáts
  • , Nicolas Noiseux
  • , Ovidiu Dressler
  • , Gianni D. Angelini
  • , Gregg W. Stone
  • , Patrick W. Serruys
  • , Joseph F. Sabik
  • , David P. Taggart

Research output: Contribution to a Journal (Peer & Non Peer)Articlepeer-review

42 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Concerns remain for a greater risk of incomplete revascularization and reduced survival with off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery compared with on-pump surgery particularly in patients with left main disease and extensive underlying myocardial ischemia. Objectives: This study sought to compare outcomes following off-pump versus on-pump surgery for left main disease by performing a post hoc analysis from the multicenter, randomized EXCEL (Evaluation of XIENCE versus Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery for Effectiveness of Left Main Revascularization) trial. Methods: The EXCEL trial was designed to compare percutaneous coronary intervention with everolimus-eluting stents versus CABG in patients with left main disease. CABG was performed with or without cardiopulmonary bypass (on-pump vs. off-pump surgery) according to the discretion of the operator. The 3-year outcomes in the off-pump and on-pump groups were compared using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) for treatment effect estimation. Results: Among 923 CABG patients, 652 and 271 patients underwent on-pump and off-pump surgery, respectively. Despite a similar extent of disease, off-pump surgery was associated with a lower rate of revascularization of the left circumflex coronary artery (84.1% vs. 90.0%; p = 0.01) and right coronary artery (31.1% vs. 40.6%; p = 0.007). After IPTW adjustment for baseline differences, off-pump surgery was associated with a significantly increased risk of 3-year all-cause death (8.8% vs. 4.5%; hazard ratio: 1.94; 95% confidence interval: 1.10 to 3.41; p = 0.02) and a nonsignificant difference in the risk for the composite endpoint of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke (11.8% vs. 9.2%; hazard ratio: 1.28; 95% confidence interval: 0.82 to 2.00; p = 0.28). Conclusions: Among patients with left main disease treated with CABG in the EXCEL trial, off-pump surgery was associated with a lower rate of revascularization of the coronary arteries supplying the inferolateral wall and an increased risk of 3-year all-cause death compared with on-pump surgery.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)729-740
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of the American College of Cardiology
Volume74
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 13 Aug 2019
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • coronary artery bypass grafting
  • left main disease
  • off-pump

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Off-Pump Versus On-Pump Bypass Surgery for Left Main Coronary Artery Disease'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this