Observed variation in the decay time of oceanic whitecap foam

Adrian H. Callaghan, Grant B. Deane, M. Dale Stokes, Brian Ward

Research output: Contribution to a Journal (Peer & Non Peer)Articlepeer-review

60 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Whitecap foam decay times for 552 individual breaking waves determined from digital images of the sea surface are reported. The images had sub-centimeter pixel resolution and were acquired at frame rates between 3 and 6 frames per second at the Martha's Vineyard Coastal Observatory over a 10-day period in 2008, subdivided into 4 observation periods. Whitecap foam decay times for individual events varied between 0.2 s to 10.4 s across the entire data set. A systematic positive correlation between whitecap foam decay time and maximum whitecap foam patch area was found for each observation period. For a given whitecap size within each observation period, the decay times varied between a factor of 2 and 5, with the largest variation occurring during unsteady environmental forcing conditions. Within observation periods, bin-averaged decay times varied by up to a factor of 4 across the range of foam patch areas. Between observation periods, the effective whitecap foam decay time, which we define as the area-weighted mean decay time, varied by a factor of 3.4 between 1.4 s and 4.8 s. We found a weak correlation between decay times and individual event-averaged breaking wave speeds. The variation in the active breaking area across all 4 observation periods was small, indicating relatively uniform surface whitecap area generating potential. We speculate that the variation in the foam decay times may be due to (i) the effect of surfactants on bubble and foam stability, and (ii) differences between bubble plume characteristics caused by a variation in breaking wave type.

Original languageEnglish
Article numberC09015
JournalJournal of Geophysical Research: Oceans
Volume117
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Observed variation in the decay time of oceanic whitecap foam'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this