Abstract
This article examines critical responses to the question of constituent power. Rather than a closed, meaning-giving moment, which originates the constitutional structure, the article looks at the various ways in which constituent power can be viewed as ‘‘open’’ and anti-underdetermined. It looks at two issues in particular: the ‘‘subject’’ of constituent power, and the nature of the ‘‘power’’ involved. The article concludes with the suggestion that we think of these works as a series of ‘‘strategic hypotheses’’ which might structure action, rather than a collection of ‘‘models’’ that would have to be applied faithfully to the world.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 378-392 |
| Number of pages | 15 |
| Journal | Law, Culture and the Humanities |
| Volume | 11 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 8 Oct 2015 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Agamben
- Constituent power
- Dussel
- Laclau
- Negri
- Rancière
- Virno
- constitutionalism
- potentia
- the multitude
- the people
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver