TY - JOUR
T1 - National and international kidney failure registries
T2 - characteristics, commonalities, and contrasts
AU - Ng, Monica S.Y.
AU - Charu, Vivek
AU - Johnson, David W.
AU - O'Shaughnessy, Michelle M.
AU - Mallett, Andrew J.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 International Society of Nephrology
PY - 2022/1
Y1 - 2022/1
N2 - Registries are essential for health infrastructure planning, benchmarking, continuous quality improvement, hypothesis generation, and real-world trials. To date, data from these registries have predominantly been analyzed in isolated “silos,” hampering efforts to analyze “big data” at the international level, an approach that provides wide-ranging benefits, including enhanced statistical power, an ability to conduct international comparisons, and greater capacity to study rare diseases. This review serves as a valuable resource to clinicians, researchers, and policymakers, by comprehensively describing kidney failure registries active in 2021, before proposing approaches for inter-registry research under current conditions, as well as solutions to enhance global capacity for data collaboration. We identified 79 kidney-failure registries spanning 77 countries worldwide. International Society of Nephrology exemplar initiatives, including the Global Kidney Health Atlas and Sharing Expertise to support the set-up of Renal Registries (SharE-RR), continue to raise awareness regarding international healthcare disparities and support the development of universal kidney-disease registries. Current barriers to inter-registry collaboration include underrepresentation of lower-income countries, poor syntactic and semantic interoperability, absence of clear consensus guidelines for healthcare data sharing, and limited researcher incentives. This review represents a call to action for international stakeholders to enact systemic change that will harmonize the current fragmented approaches to kidney-failure registry data collection and research.
AB - Registries are essential for health infrastructure planning, benchmarking, continuous quality improvement, hypothesis generation, and real-world trials. To date, data from these registries have predominantly been analyzed in isolated “silos,” hampering efforts to analyze “big data” at the international level, an approach that provides wide-ranging benefits, including enhanced statistical power, an ability to conduct international comparisons, and greater capacity to study rare diseases. This review serves as a valuable resource to clinicians, researchers, and policymakers, by comprehensively describing kidney failure registries active in 2021, before proposing approaches for inter-registry research under current conditions, as well as solutions to enhance global capacity for data collaboration. We identified 79 kidney-failure registries spanning 77 countries worldwide. International Society of Nephrology exemplar initiatives, including the Global Kidney Health Atlas and Sharing Expertise to support the set-up of Renal Registries (SharE-RR), continue to raise awareness regarding international healthcare disparities and support the development of universal kidney-disease registries. Current barriers to inter-registry collaboration include underrepresentation of lower-income countries, poor syntactic and semantic interoperability, absence of clear consensus guidelines for healthcare data sharing, and limited researcher incentives. This review represents a call to action for international stakeholders to enact systemic change that will harmonize the current fragmented approaches to kidney-failure registry data collection and research.
KW - data sharing
KW - dialysis
KW - inter-registry collaboration
KW - kidney failure
KW - registry
KW - transplantation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85120466183&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.kint.2021.09.024
DO - 10.1016/j.kint.2021.09.024
M3 - Review article
C2 - 34736973
AN - SCOPUS:85120466183
SN - 0085-2538
VL - 101
SP - 23
EP - 35
JO - Kidney International
JF - Kidney International
IS - 1
ER -