TY - JOUR
T1 - Multimodality imaging for left ventricular hypertrophy severity grading
T2 - A methodological review
AU - Alkema, Maaike
AU - Spitzer, Ernest
AU - Soliman, Osama I.I.
AU - Loewe, Christian
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Korean Society of Echocardiography.
PY - 2016/12
Y1 - 2016/12
N2 - Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), defined by an increase in left ventricular mass (LVM), is a common cardiac finding generally caused by an increase in pressure or volume load. Assessing severity of LVH is of great clinical value in terms of prognosis and treatment choices, as LVH severity grades correlate with the risk for presenting cardiovascular events. The three main cardiac parameters for the assessment of LVH are wall thickness, LVM, and LV geometry. Echocardiography, with large availability and low cost, is the technique of choice for their assessment. Consequently, reference values for LVH severity in clinical guidelines are based on this technique. However, cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) and computed tomography (CT) are increasingly used in clinical practice, providing excellent image quality. Nevertheless, there is no extensive data to support reference values based on these techniques, while comparative studies between the three techniques show different results in wall thickness and LVM measurements. In this paper, we provide an overview of the different methodologies used to assess LVH severity with echocardiography, CMR and CT. We argue that establishing reference values per imaging modality, and possibly indexed to body surface area and classified per gender, ethnicity and age-group, might be essential for the correct classification of LVH severity.
AB - Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), defined by an increase in left ventricular mass (LVM), is a common cardiac finding generally caused by an increase in pressure or volume load. Assessing severity of LVH is of great clinical value in terms of prognosis and treatment choices, as LVH severity grades correlate with the risk for presenting cardiovascular events. The three main cardiac parameters for the assessment of LVH are wall thickness, LVM, and LV geometry. Echocardiography, with large availability and low cost, is the technique of choice for their assessment. Consequently, reference values for LVH severity in clinical guidelines are based on this technique. However, cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) and computed tomography (CT) are increasingly used in clinical practice, providing excellent image quality. Nevertheless, there is no extensive data to support reference values based on these techniques, while comparative studies between the three techniques show different results in wall thickness and LVM measurements. In this paper, we provide an overview of the different methodologies used to assess LVH severity with echocardiography, CMR and CT. We argue that establishing reference values per imaging modality, and possibly indexed to body surface area and classified per gender, ethnicity and age-group, might be essential for the correct classification of LVH severity.
KW - Echocardiography
KW - Hypertrophy
KW - Left ventricular
KW - Magnetic resonance imaging
KW - Multidetector computed tomography
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85007518668&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.4250/jcu.2016.24.4.257
DO - 10.4250/jcu.2016.24.4.257
M3 - Review article
SN - 1975-4612
VL - 24
SP - 257
EP - 267
JO - Journal of Cardiovascular Ultrasound
JF - Journal of Cardiovascular Ultrasound
IS - 4
ER -