Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Multi-Trait analysis of gwas and biological insights into cognition: A response to hill (2018)

  • Max Lam
  • , Joey W. Trampush
  • , Jin Yu
  • , Emma Knowles
  • , Srdjan Djurovic
  • , Ingrid Melle
  • , Kjetil Sundet
  • , Andrea Christoforou
  • , Ivar Reinvang
  • , Pamela Derosse
  • , Astri J. Lundervold
  • , Vidar M. Steen
  • , Thomas Espeseth
  • , Katri Räikkönen
  • , Elisabeth Widen
  • , Aarno Palotie
  • , Johan G. Eriksson
  • , Ina Giegling
  • , Bettina Konte
  • , Panos Roussos
  • Stella Giakoumaki, Katherine E. Burdick, Antony Payton, William Ollier, Ornit Chiba-Falek, Deborah K. Attix, Anna C. Need, Elizabeth T. Cirulli, Aristotle N. Voineskos, Nikos C. Stefanis, Dimitrios Avramopoulos, Alex Hatzimanolis, Dan E. Arking, Nikolaos Smyrnis, Robert M. Bilder, Nelson A. Freimer, Tyrone D. Cannon, Edythe London, Russell A. Poldrack, Fred W. Sabb, Eliza Congdon, Emily Drabant Conley, Matthew A. Scult, Dwight Dickinson, Richard E. Straub, Gary Donohoe, Derek Morris, Aiden Corvin, Michael Gill, Ahmad R. Hariri, Daniel R. Weinberger, Neil Pendleton, Panos Bitsios, Dan Rujescu, Jari Lahti, Stephanie Le Hellard, Matthew C. Keller, Ole A. Andreassen, David C. Glahn, Anil K. Malhotra, Todd Lencz
  • Institute of Mental Health
  • BrainWorkup, LLC
  • The Zucker Hillside Hospital
  • Yale University School of Medicine
  • Oslo University Hospital
  • University of Bergen
  • University of Oslo
  • Haukeland University Hospital
  • University of Helsinki
  • Wellcome Trust
  • Helsinki University Central Hospital
  • Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare - THL
  • Folkhälsan
  • University of Halle
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
  • Clinical Center (VISN 2)
  • University of Crete
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital
  • University of Manchester
  • University of Manchester
  • Duke University Medical Center
  • Department of Neurology
  • Imperial College London
  • Human Longevity Inc
  • University of Toronto
  • Eginition Hospital
  • University Mental Health Research Institute
  • Theodor-Theohari Cozzika Foundation
  • The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
  • University of California
  • Yale University
  • Stanford University
  • University of Oregon
  • 23andMe Inc.
  • Duke University
  • National Institute of Mental Health Intramural Research Program
  • Johns Hopkins University
  • Trinity College Dublin
  • University of Colorado Boulder
  • The Hofstra North Shore–Long Island Jewish School of Medicine
  • Laboratory of Developmental Erythropoiesis

Research output: Contribution to a Journal (Peer & Non Peer) › Article › peer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Hill (Twin Research and Human Genetics, Vol. 21, 2018, 84-88) presented a critique of our recently published paper in Cell Reports entitled 'Large-Scale Cognitive GWAS Meta-Analysis Reveals Tissue-Specific Neural Expression and Potential Nootropic Drug Targets' (Lam et al., Cell Reports, Vol. 21, 2017, 2597-2613). Specifically, Hill offered several interrelated comments suggesting potential problems with our use of a new analytic method called Multi-Trait Analysis of GWAS (MTAG) (Turley et al., Nature Genetics, Vol. 50, 2018, 229-237). In this brief article, we respond to each of these concerns. Using empirical data, we conclude that our MTAG results do not suffer from 'inflation in the FDR [false discovery rate]', as suggested by Hill (Twin Research and Human Genetics, Vol. 21, 2018, 84-88), and are not 'more relevant to the genetic contributions to education than they are to the genetic contributions to intelligence'.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)394-397
Number of pages4
JournalTwin Research and Human Genetics
Volume21
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2018

Keywords

  • Calcium channel
  • Cerebellum
  • Gene expression
  • General cognitive ability
  • Gwas
  • Neurodevelopment
  • Nootropics
  • Potassium channel
  • Synapse

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Multi-Trait analysis of gwas and biological insights into cognition: A response to hill (2018)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this