Abstract
Purpose of Review: Our purpose was to discuss the methodological limitations of observational nutritional epidemiology research, using observational studies on coffee intake and health as a case example. Recent Findings: A number of recent observational studies on the potential health effects of daily coffee intake have reported protective associations between higher coffee intake and a variety of health outcomes, including death. This is inconsistent with the findings from classic studies showing an increased risk of coronary heart disease events, performed in young adults with a homogeneous education level, and adjusting for tobacco use. Summary: Many nutritional epidemiological studies have important limitations, which limit their validity. These include the use of prevalent user designs, risk of reverse causality, measurement error particularly of the exposure of interest, and residual confounding by socioeconomic status. In this review, we discuss these potential issues and provide constructive recommendations intended to help minimize them.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 4 |
| Journal | Current Cardiovascular Risk Reports |
| Volume | 12 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Feb 2018 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- Bias
- Coffee
- Confounding
- Epidemiologic methods
- Nutritional epidemiology
- Observational
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Methodological Issues in Nutritional Epidemiology Research—Sorting Through the Confusion'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver