Methodological considerations in injury burden of disease studies across Europe: a systematic literature review

Periklis Charalampous; Elena Pallari; Vanessa Gorasso; Elena von der Lippe; Brecht Devleesschauwer; Sara M. Pires; Dietrich Plass; Jane Idavain; Che Henry Ngwa; Isabel Noguer; Alicia Padron-Monedero; Rodrigo Sarmiento; Marek Majdan; Balázs Ádám; Ala’a AlKerwi; Seila Cilovic-Lagarija; Benjamin Clarsen; Barbara Corso; Sarah Cuschieri; Keren Dopelt; Mary Economou; Florian Fischer; Alberto Freitas; Juan Manuel García-González; Federica Gazzelloni; Artemis Gkitakou; Hakan Gulmez; Paul Hynds; Gaetano Isola; Lea S. Jakobsen; Zubair Kabir; Katarzyna Kissimova-Skarbek; Ann Kristin Knudsen; Naime Meriç Konar; Carina Ladeira; Brian Lassen; Aaron Liew; Marjeta Majer; Enkeleint A. Mechili; Alibek Mereke; Lorenzo Monasta; Stefania Mondello; Joana Nazaré Morgado; Evangelia Nena; Edmond S.W. Ng; Vikram Niranjan; Iskra Alexandra Nola; Rónán O’Caoimh; Panagiotis Petrou; Vera Pinheiro; Miguel Reina Ortiz; Silvia Riva; Hanen Samouda; João Vasco Santos; Cornelia Melinda Adi Santoso; Milena Santric Milicevic; Dimitrios Skempes; Ana Catarina Sousa; Niko Speybroeck; Fimka Tozija; Brigid Unim; Hilal Bektaş Uysal; Fabrizio Giovanni Vaccaro; Orsolya Varga; Milena Vasic; Francesco Saverio Violante; Grant M.A. Wyper; Suzanne Polinder; Juanita A. Haagsma

doi:10.1186/s12889-022-13925-z

Methodological considerations in injury burden of disease studies across Europe: a systematic literature review

Periklis Charalampous
, Elena Pallari
, Vanessa Gorasso
, Elena von der Lippe
, Brecht Devleesschauwer
, Sara M. Pires
, Dietrich Plass
, Jane Idavain
, Che Henry Ngwa
, Isabel Noguer
, Alicia Padron-Monedero
, Rodrigo Sarmiento
, Marek Majdan
, Balázs Ádám
, Ala’a AlKerwi
, Seila Cilovic-Lagarija
, Benjamin Clarsen
, Barbara Corso
, Sarah Cuschieri
, Keren Dopelt

Mary Economou, Florian Fischer, Alberto Freitas, Juan Manuel García-González, Federica Gazzelloni, Artemis Gkitakou, Hakan Gulmez, Paul Hynds, Gaetano Isola, Lea S. Jakobsen, Zubair Kabir, Katarzyna Kissimova-Skarbek, Ann Kristin Knudsen, Naime Meriç Konar, Carina Ladeira, Brian Lassen, Aaron Liew, Marjeta Majer, Enkeleint A. Mechili, Alibek Mereke, Lorenzo Monasta, Stefania Mondello, Joana Nazaré Morgado, Evangelia Nena, Edmond S.W. Ng, Vikram Niranjan, Iskra Alexandra Nola, Rónán O’Caoimh, Panagiotis Petrou, Vera Pinheiro, Miguel Reina Ortiz, Silvia Riva, Hanen Samouda, João Vasco Santos, Cornelia Melinda Adi Santoso, Milena Santric Milicevic, Dimitrios Skempes, Ana Catarina Sousa, Niko Speybroeck, Fimka Tozija, Brigid Unim, Hilal Bektaş Uysal, Fabrizio Giovanni Vaccaro, Orsolya Varga, Milena Vasic, Francesco Saverio Violante, Grant M.A. Wyper, Suzanne Polinder, Juanita A. Haagsma

Medicine

Erasmus MC
Minerva House
Ghent University
Robert Koch Institute
Technical University of Denmark
German Environment Agency
National Institute for Health Development
Gothenburg University
American University of Beirut
Carlos Iii Health Institute
University of Applied and Environmental Sciences
Trnava University
College of Medicine and Health Sciences United Arab Emirates University
University Medical School
Service Epidemiology and Statistics
Institute for Public Health FB&H
Norwegian School of Sport Sciences
Norwegian Institute of Public Health
Western Norway University of Applied Sciences
Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche
University of Malta
Ashkelon Academic College
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
Cyprus University of Technology
Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin
University of Porto
Universidad Pablo de Olavide, de Sevilla
Institute and Faculty of Actuaries
Izmir Democracy University
Dublin Institute of Technology
University of Catania
University College Cork
Jagiellonian University Medical College
Kirsehir Ahi Evran University
Lisbon University and Higher School of Health Technology of Lisbon
Nova University of Lisbon
University of Zagreb School of Medicine
University of Crete Medical School
University of Vlora
Al-Farabi Kazakh National University
IRCCS Burlo Garofolo
Dipartimento DIMED
University of Lisbon
Democritus University of Thrace, Medical School
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
University College Dublin
Mercy University Hospital
University of Nicosia
University of South Florida Center for Global Health and Infectious Diseases Research
St Mary’s University, Twickenham
Luxembourg Institute of Health
ARS Norte
University of Debrecen
University Belgrade
Swiss Paraplegic Research
University of Évora
Université Catholique de Louvain
Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje
Department of Technology and Health
Adnan Menderes University School of Medicine
Vita-Salute San Raffaele University
University Business Academy in Novi Sad
Institute of Public Health of Serbia Dr Milan Jovanović Batut
University of Bologna
University of Bologna
Public Health Scotland

Research output: Contribution to a Journal (Peer & Non Peer) › Article › peer-review

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Calculating the disease burden due to injury is complex, as it requires many methodological choices. Until now, an overview of the methodological design choices that have been made in burden of disease (BoD) studies in injury populations is not available. The aim of this systematic literature review was to identify existing injury BoD studies undertaken across Europe and to comprehensively review the methodological design choices and assumption parameters that have been made to calculate years of life lost (YLL) and years lived with disability (YLD) in these studies. Methods: We searched EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane Central, Google Scholar, and Web of Science, and the grey literature supplemented by handsearching, for BoD studies. We included injury BoD studies that quantified the BoD expressed in YLL, YLD, and disability-adjusted life years (DALY) in countries within the European Region between early-1990 and mid-2021. Results: We retrieved 2,914 results of which 48 performed an injury-specific BoD assessment. Single-country independent and Global Burden of Disease (GBD)-linked injury BoD studies were performed in 11 European countries. Approximately 79% of injury BoD studies reported the BoD by external cause-of-injury. Most independent studies used the incidence-based approach to calculate YLDs. About half of the injury disease burden studies applied disability weights (DWs) developed by the GBD study. Almost all independent injury studies have determined YLL using national life tables. Conclusions: Considerable methodological variation across independent injury BoD assessments was observed; differences were mainly apparent in the design choices and assumption parameters towards injury YLD calculations, implementation of DWs, and the choice of life table for YLL calculations. Development and use of guidelines for performing and reporting of injury BoD studies is crucial to enhance transparency and comparability of injury BoD estimates across Europe and beyond.

Original language	English
Article number	1564
Journal	BMC public health
Volume	22
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13925-z
Publication status	Published - Dec 2022

Keywords

Burden of disease
Burden of Injury
Disability-adjusted life years
Methodology
Review

Access to Document

10.1186/s12889-022-13925-z

Cite this

Charalampous, P., Pallari, E., Gorasso, V., von der Lippe, E., Devleesschauwer, B., Pires, S. M., Plass, D., Idavain, J., Ngwa, C. H., Noguer, I., Padron-Monedero, A., Sarmiento, R., Majdan, M., Ádám, B., AlKerwi, A., Cilovic-Lagarija, S., Clarsen, B., Corso, B., Cuschieri, S., ... Haagsma, J. A. (2022). Methodological considerations in injury burden of disease studies across Europe: a systematic literature review. BMC public health, 22(1), Article 1564. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13925-z

@article{56b448a9d0d44d7b95e0efcd7cf0bbf3,

title = "Methodological considerations in injury burden of disease studies across Europe: a systematic literature review",

abstract = "Background: Calculating the disease burden due to injury is complex, as it requires many methodological choices. Until now, an overview of the methodological design choices that have been made in burden of disease (BoD) studies in injury populations is not available. The aim of this systematic literature review was to identify existing injury BoD studies undertaken across Europe and to comprehensively review the methodological design choices and assumption parameters that have been made to calculate years of life lost (YLL) and years lived with disability (YLD) in these studies. Methods: We searched EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane Central, Google Scholar, and Web of Science, and the grey literature supplemented by handsearching, for BoD studies. We included injury BoD studies that quantified the BoD expressed in YLL, YLD, and disability-adjusted life years (DALY) in countries within the European Region between early-1990 and mid-2021. Results: We retrieved 2,914 results of which 48 performed an injury-specific BoD assessment. Single-country independent and Global Burden of Disease (GBD)-linked injury BoD studies were performed in 11 European countries. Approximately 79\% of injury BoD studies reported the BoD by external cause-of-injury. Most independent studies used the incidence-based approach to calculate YLDs. About half of the injury disease burden studies applied disability weights (DWs) developed by the GBD study. Almost all independent injury studies have determined YLL using national life tables. Conclusions: Considerable methodological variation across independent injury BoD assessments was observed; differences were mainly apparent in the design choices and assumption parameters towards injury YLD calculations, implementation of DWs, and the choice of life table for YLL calculations. Development and use of guidelines for performing and reporting of injury BoD studies is crucial to enhance transparency and comparability of injury BoD estimates across Europe and beyond.",

keywords = "Burden of disease, Burden of Injury, Disability-adjusted life years, Methodology, Review",

author = "Periklis Charalampous and Elena Pallari and Vanessa Gorasso and \{von der Lippe\}, Elena and Brecht Devleesschauwer and Pires, \{Sara M.\} and Dietrich Plass and Jane Idavain and Ngwa, \{Che Henry\} and Isabel Noguer and Alicia Padron-Monedero and Rodrigo Sarmiento and Marek Majdan and Bal{\'a}zs {\'A}d{\'a}m and Ala{\textquoteright}a AlKerwi and Seila Cilovic-Lagarija and Benjamin Clarsen and Barbara Corso and Sarah Cuschieri and Keren Dopelt and Mary Economou and Florian Fischer and Alberto Freitas and Garc{\'i}a-Gonz{\'a}lez, \{Juan Manuel\} and Federica Gazzelloni and Artemis Gkitakou and Hakan Gulmez and Paul Hynds and Gaetano Isola and Jakobsen, \{Lea S.\} and Zubair Kabir and Katarzyna Kissimova-Skarbek and Knudsen, \{Ann Kristin\} and Konar, \{Naime Meri{\c c}\} and Carina Ladeira and Brian Lassen and Aaron Liew and Marjeta Majer and Mechili, \{Enkeleint A.\} and Alibek Mereke and Lorenzo Monasta and Stefania Mondello and Morgado, \{Joana Nazar{\'e}\} and Evangelia Nena and Ng, \{Edmond S.W.\} and Vikram Niranjan and Nola, \{Iskra Alexandra\} and R{\'o}n{\'a}n O{\textquoteright}Caoimh and Panagiotis Petrou and Vera Pinheiro and Ortiz, \{Miguel Reina\} and Silvia Riva and Hanen Samouda and Santos, \{Jo{\~a}o Vasco\} and Santoso, \{Cornelia Melinda Adi\} and Milicevic, \{Milena Santric\} and Dimitrios Skempes and Sousa, \{Ana Catarina\} and Niko Speybroeck and Fimka Tozija and Brigid Unim and Uysal, \{Hilal Bekta{\c s}\} and Vaccaro, \{Fabrizio Giovanni\} and Orsolya Varga and Milena Vasic and Violante, \{Francesco Saverio\} and Wyper, \{Grant M.A.\} and Suzanne Polinder and Haagsma, \{Juanita A.\}",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022, The Author(s).",

year = "2022",

month = dec,

doi = "10.1186/s12889-022-13925-z",

language = "English",

volume = "22",

journal = "BMC public health",

issn = "1471-2458",

publisher = "BioMed Central Ltd",

number = "1",

}

Charalampous, P, Pallari, E, Gorasso, V, von der Lippe, E, Devleesschauwer, B, Pires, SM, Plass, D, Idavain, J, Ngwa, CH, Noguer, I, Padron-Monedero, A, Sarmiento, R, Majdan, M, Ádám, B, AlKerwi, A, Cilovic-Lagarija, S, Clarsen, B, Corso, B, Cuschieri, S, Dopelt, K, Economou, M, Fischer, F, Freitas, A, García-González, JM, Gazzelloni, F, Gkitakou, A, Gulmez, H, Hynds, P, Isola, G, Jakobsen, LS, Kabir, Z, Kissimova-Skarbek, K, Knudsen, AK, Konar, NM, Ladeira, C, Lassen, B, Liew, A, Majer, M, Mechili, EA, Mereke, A, Monasta, L, Mondello, S, Morgado, JN, Nena, E, Ng, ESW, Niranjan, V, Nola, IA, O’Caoimh, R, Petrou, P, Pinheiro, V, Ortiz, MR, Riva, S, Samouda, H, Santos, JV, Santoso, CMA, Milicevic, MS, Skempes, D, Sousa, AC, Speybroeck, N, Tozija, F, Unim, B, Uysal, HB, Vaccaro, FG, Varga, O, Vasic, M, Violante, FS, Wyper, GMA, Polinder, S & Haagsma, JA 2022, 'Methodological considerations in injury burden of disease studies across Europe: a systematic literature review', BMC public health, vol. 22, no. 1, 1564. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13925-z

TY - JOUR

T1 - Methodological considerations in injury burden of disease studies across Europe

T2 - a systematic literature review

AU - Charalampous, Periklis

AU - Pallari, Elena

AU - Gorasso, Vanessa

AU - von der Lippe, Elena

AU - Devleesschauwer, Brecht

AU - Pires, Sara M.

AU - Plass, Dietrich

AU - Idavain, Jane

AU - Ngwa, Che Henry

AU - Noguer, Isabel

AU - Padron-Monedero, Alicia

AU - Sarmiento, Rodrigo

AU - Majdan, Marek

AU - Ádám, Balázs

AU - AlKerwi, Ala’a

AU - Cilovic-Lagarija, Seila

AU - Clarsen, Benjamin

AU - Corso, Barbara

AU - Cuschieri, Sarah

AU - Dopelt, Keren

AU - Economou, Mary

AU - Fischer, Florian

AU - Freitas, Alberto

AU - García-González, Juan Manuel

AU - Gazzelloni, Federica

AU - Gkitakou, Artemis

AU - Gulmez, Hakan

AU - Hynds, Paul

AU - Isola, Gaetano

AU - Jakobsen, Lea S.

AU - Kabir, Zubair

AU - Kissimova-Skarbek, Katarzyna

AU - Knudsen, Ann Kristin

AU - Konar, Naime Meriç

AU - Ladeira, Carina

AU - Lassen, Brian

AU - Liew, Aaron

AU - Majer, Marjeta

AU - Mechili, Enkeleint A.

AU - Mereke, Alibek

AU - Monasta, Lorenzo

AU - Mondello, Stefania

AU - Morgado, Joana Nazaré

AU - Nena, Evangelia

AU - Ng, Edmond S.W.

AU - Niranjan, Vikram

AU - Nola, Iskra Alexandra

AU - O’Caoimh, Rónán

AU - Petrou, Panagiotis

AU - Pinheiro, Vera

AU - Ortiz, Miguel Reina

AU - Riva, Silvia

AU - Samouda, Hanen

AU - Santos, João Vasco

AU - Santoso, Cornelia Melinda Adi

AU - Milicevic, Milena Santric

AU - Skempes, Dimitrios

AU - Sousa, Ana Catarina

AU - Speybroeck, Niko

AU - Tozija, Fimka

AU - Unim, Brigid

AU - Uysal, Hilal Bektaş

AU - Vaccaro, Fabrizio Giovanni

AU - Varga, Orsolya

AU - Vasic, Milena

AU - Violante, Francesco Saverio

AU - Wyper, Grant M.A.

AU - Polinder, Suzanne

AU - Haagsma, Juanita A.

PY - 2022/12

Y1 - 2022/12

N2 - Background: Calculating the disease burden due to injury is complex, as it requires many methodological choices. Until now, an overview of the methodological design choices that have been made in burden of disease (BoD) studies in injury populations is not available. The aim of this systematic literature review was to identify existing injury BoD studies undertaken across Europe and to comprehensively review the methodological design choices and assumption parameters that have been made to calculate years of life lost (YLL) and years lived with disability (YLD) in these studies. Methods: We searched EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane Central, Google Scholar, and Web of Science, and the grey literature supplemented by handsearching, for BoD studies. We included injury BoD studies that quantified the BoD expressed in YLL, YLD, and disability-adjusted life years (DALY) in countries within the European Region between early-1990 and mid-2021. Results: We retrieved 2,914 results of which 48 performed an injury-specific BoD assessment. Single-country independent and Global Burden of Disease (GBD)-linked injury BoD studies were performed in 11 European countries. Approximately 79% of injury BoD studies reported the BoD by external cause-of-injury. Most independent studies used the incidence-based approach to calculate YLDs. About half of the injury disease burden studies applied disability weights (DWs) developed by the GBD study. Almost all independent injury studies have determined YLL using national life tables. Conclusions: Considerable methodological variation across independent injury BoD assessments was observed; differences were mainly apparent in the design choices and assumption parameters towards injury YLD calculations, implementation of DWs, and the choice of life table for YLL calculations. Development and use of guidelines for performing and reporting of injury BoD studies is crucial to enhance transparency and comparability of injury BoD estimates across Europe and beyond.

AB - Background: Calculating the disease burden due to injury is complex, as it requires many methodological choices. Until now, an overview of the methodological design choices that have been made in burden of disease (BoD) studies in injury populations is not available. The aim of this systematic literature review was to identify existing injury BoD studies undertaken across Europe and to comprehensively review the methodological design choices and assumption parameters that have been made to calculate years of life lost (YLL) and years lived with disability (YLD) in these studies. Methods: We searched EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane Central, Google Scholar, and Web of Science, and the grey literature supplemented by handsearching, for BoD studies. We included injury BoD studies that quantified the BoD expressed in YLL, YLD, and disability-adjusted life years (DALY) in countries within the European Region between early-1990 and mid-2021. Results: We retrieved 2,914 results of which 48 performed an injury-specific BoD assessment. Single-country independent and Global Burden of Disease (GBD)-linked injury BoD studies were performed in 11 European countries. Approximately 79% of injury BoD studies reported the BoD by external cause-of-injury. Most independent studies used the incidence-based approach to calculate YLDs. About half of the injury disease burden studies applied disability weights (DWs) developed by the GBD study. Almost all independent injury studies have determined YLL using national life tables. Conclusions: Considerable methodological variation across independent injury BoD assessments was observed; differences were mainly apparent in the design choices and assumption parameters towards injury YLD calculations, implementation of DWs, and the choice of life table for YLL calculations. Development and use of guidelines for performing and reporting of injury BoD studies is crucial to enhance transparency and comparability of injury BoD estimates across Europe and beyond.

KW - Burden of disease

KW - Burden of Injury

KW - Disability-adjusted life years

KW - Methodology

KW - Review

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85136057023

U2 - 10.1186/s12889-022-13925-z

DO - 10.1186/s12889-022-13925-z

M3 - Article

C2 - 35978333

AN - SCOPUS:85136057023

SN - 1471-2458

VL - 22

JO - BMC public health

JF - BMC public health

IS - 1

M1 - 1564

ER -

Methodological considerations in injury burden of disease studies across Europe: a systematic literature review

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this