Abstract
The gold standard treatment of primary hyperparathyroidism was bilateral neck exploration. Video-assisted parathyroidectomy (VAP) facilitated less invasive surgery, however there is lack of evidence comparing it to open parathyroidectomy (OP). A meta-analysis was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines to compare them. In three eligible randomized controlled trials (241 patients), VAP operative time (61.7 + - 12 min) was comparable to OP (59.9 + - 6 min), less early postoperative pain, higher cosmetic satisfaction (statistically not significant) and 4% failure rate (none in OP). 25% of VAP converted to OP. Hypocalcaemia was six-times less in VAP (RR 6.4). Careful patient selection and unequivocally positive preoperative localization are critical to the success of this procedure. To our knowledge, this is the first meta-analysis comparing the two techniques.
| Original language | English (Ireland) |
|---|---|
| Media of output | Reviews |
| Publisher | FUTURE MEDICINE LTD |
| Volume | 2 |
| ISBN (Print) | 2045-0869 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 2045-0869 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Nov 2015 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Meta-analysis of video-assisted versus open parathyroidectomy for primary hyperparathyroidism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver