Making evaluation work for the practitioner evaluator: experience from the field of environmental education

Research output: Contribution to a Journal (Peer & Non Peer)Articlepeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Drawing on work from environmental education, evaluation, and practitioner research, this paper presents a discussion of programme evaluation practices from the practitioner’s perspective. This discussion is informed by a meta-evaluation conducted on ten-years (2008–2018) of data collected from a suite of place-based learning programmes delivered by a charity in Ireland. Analysis of the data available allowed for an evaluation of the programmes in question, and these were then further analysed to provide the meta-evaluation. Key findings and discussions from the analysis include the impact of time constraints on evaluation; evaluation as part of organisational culture; strengths/weaknesses of evaluations led by practitioner evaluators; and opportunities provided by meta-evaluation in directing organisational change. This paper serves as a valuable resource for researchers and practitioners as it provides a framework to support future evaluations led by practitioner evaluators.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)715-734
Number of pages20
JournalEnvironmental Education Research
Volume28
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2022

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 4 - Quality Education
    SDG 4 Quality Education
  2. SDG 12 - Responsible Consumption and Production
    SDG 12 Responsible Consumption and Production

Keywords

  • Evaluation
  • impact measurement
  • meta-evaluation
  • place-based learning
  • practitioner research

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Making evaluation work for the practitioner evaluator: experience from the field of environmental education'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this