TY - JOUR
T1 - Major obstetric haemorrhage
T2 - Incidence, management and quality of care in Irish maternity units
AU - On behalf of the Maternal Morbidity Advisory Group
AU - Greene, Richard A.
AU - McKernan, Joye
AU - Manning, Edel
AU - Corcoran, Paul
AU - Byrne, Bridgette
AU - Cooley, Sharon
AU - Daly, Deirdre
AU - Fallon, Anne
AU - Higgins, Mary
AU - Jones, Claire
AU - Kinsella, Ita
AU - Murphy, Cliona
AU - Murphy, Janet
AU - Bhuinneain, Meabh Ni
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Authors
PY - 2021/2
Y1 - 2021/2
N2 - Objective: To assess major obstetric haemorrhage incidence, management and quality of care in Irish maternity units. Design: In collaboration with Irish maternity units the National Perinatal Epidemiology Centre (Leitao et al., 2020) carried out a national clinical audit and surveillance of major obstetric haemorrhage (MOH). Methods: MOH was defined as blood loss of at least 2500 ml, transfusion of five or more units of blood or documented treatment for coagulopathy. Co-ordinators in maternity units completed detailed case assessment forms. The denominator data obtained from the individual units was restricted to live births and stillbirths of babies weighing at least 500 g. International Classification of Diseases diagnostic codes from hospital discharge records were used to identify cases of postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) and blood transfusion. Results: During the time period, 2011–2018, there was a 54 % increase in MOH, a 60 % increase in PPH and a 54 % increase in blood transfusion. For 497 reported cases of MOH in 2011–2013, the median estimated blood loss was 3000 ml (range: 600-13,000 ml) and uterine atony was the most common cause. At least one uterotonic agent was used to arrest the bleeding in 94 % of the 477 MOH cases associated with a vaginal or caesarean delivery. A blood transfusion was received in 93 % of cases. Regarding quality of care, the vast majority of reported cases were described as receiving appropriate care and were well managed. Conclusion: Internationally, obstetric haemorrhage and especially PPH and its increasing trend remains a major challenge for service providers and clinical staff. A standardisation of definitions of PPH/severe PPH/MOH and agreed approaches to quantitation of blood loss would be valuable developments to allow better investigation and shared learning. Reducing the burden of this morbidity through improvements in care should be a real focus of maternity services.
AB - Objective: To assess major obstetric haemorrhage incidence, management and quality of care in Irish maternity units. Design: In collaboration with Irish maternity units the National Perinatal Epidemiology Centre (Leitao et al., 2020) carried out a national clinical audit and surveillance of major obstetric haemorrhage (MOH). Methods: MOH was defined as blood loss of at least 2500 ml, transfusion of five or more units of blood or documented treatment for coagulopathy. Co-ordinators in maternity units completed detailed case assessment forms. The denominator data obtained from the individual units was restricted to live births and stillbirths of babies weighing at least 500 g. International Classification of Diseases diagnostic codes from hospital discharge records were used to identify cases of postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) and blood transfusion. Results: During the time period, 2011–2018, there was a 54 % increase in MOH, a 60 % increase in PPH and a 54 % increase in blood transfusion. For 497 reported cases of MOH in 2011–2013, the median estimated blood loss was 3000 ml (range: 600-13,000 ml) and uterine atony was the most common cause. At least one uterotonic agent was used to arrest the bleeding in 94 % of the 477 MOH cases associated with a vaginal or caesarean delivery. A blood transfusion was received in 93 % of cases. Regarding quality of care, the vast majority of reported cases were described as receiving appropriate care and were well managed. Conclusion: Internationally, obstetric haemorrhage and especially PPH and its increasing trend remains a major challenge for service providers and clinical staff. A standardisation of definitions of PPH/severe PPH/MOH and agreed approaches to quantitation of blood loss would be valuable developments to allow better investigation and shared learning. Reducing the burden of this morbidity through improvements in care should be a real focus of maternity services.
KW - Estimated blood loss
KW - Major obstetric haemorrhage (MOH)
KW - Management and quality of care
KW - Severe maternal morbidity (SMM)
KW - Uterine atony
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85098500979&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.12.021
DO - 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.12.021
M3 - Article
SN - 0301-2115
VL - 257
SP - 114
EP - 120
JO - European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
JF - European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
ER -