MacDonald v Nicholson: A Case of Contractual Confusion

Martin Hogg

MacDonald v Nicholson: A Case of Contractual Confusion

Martin Hogg

Law

Research output: Contribution to a Journal (Peer & Non Peer) › Article › peer-review

Abstract

This article considers the recent case of MacDonald v Nicholson, critiquing those portions of the judgment relating to the uncertainty of the contract price, the nature and extent of the breach, and the characterisation of restitutio in integrum suggested by one of the parties.This article considers the recent case of MacDonald v Nicholson, critiquing those portions of the judgment relating to the uncertainty of the contract price, the nature and extent of the breach, and the characterisation of restitutio in integrum suggested by one of the parties.

Original language	English (Ireland)
Journal	Edinburgh Law Review
Volume	15
Issue number	22
Publication status	Published - 1 Jan 2011

Authors (Note for portal: view the doc link for the full list of authors)

Authors
Hogg, Martin

Cite this

@article{2f5ce2c08634481bb6ad5508d006c349,

title = "MacDonald v Nicholson: A Case of Contractual Confusion",

abstract = "This article considers the recent case of MacDonald v Nicholson, critiquing those portions of the judgment relating to the uncertainty of the contract price, the nature and extent of the breach, and the characterisation of restitutio in integrum suggested by one of the parties.This article considers the recent case of MacDonald v Nicholson, critiquing those portions of the judgment relating to the uncertainty of the contract price, the nature and extent of the breach, and the characterisation of restitutio in integrum suggested by one of the parties.",

author = "Martin Hogg",

year = "2011",

month = jan,

day = "1",

language = "English (Ireland)",

volume = "15",

journal = "Edinburgh Law Review ",

number = "22",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - MacDonald v Nicholson: A Case of Contractual Confusion

AU - Hogg, Martin

PY - 2011/1/1

Y1 - 2011/1/1

N2 - This article considers the recent case of MacDonald v Nicholson, critiquing those portions of the judgment relating to the uncertainty of the contract price, the nature and extent of the breach, and the characterisation of restitutio in integrum suggested by one of the parties.This article considers the recent case of MacDonald v Nicholson, critiquing those portions of the judgment relating to the uncertainty of the contract price, the nature and extent of the breach, and the characterisation of restitutio in integrum suggested by one of the parties.

AB - This article considers the recent case of MacDonald v Nicholson, critiquing those portions of the judgment relating to the uncertainty of the contract price, the nature and extent of the breach, and the characterisation of restitutio in integrum suggested by one of the parties.This article considers the recent case of MacDonald v Nicholson, critiquing those portions of the judgment relating to the uncertainty of the contract price, the nature and extent of the breach, and the characterisation of restitutio in integrum suggested by one of the parties.

M3 - Article

VL - 15

JO - Edinburgh Law Review

JF - Edinburgh Law Review

IS - 22

ER -

MacDonald v Nicholson: A Case of Contractual Confusion

Abstract

Authors (Note for portal: view the doc link for the full list of authors)

Fingerprint

Cite this