Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Low-Content Quantification in Powders Using Raman Spectroscopy: A Facile Chemometric Approach to Sub 0.1% Limits of Detection

  • Boyan Li
  • , Amandine Calvet
  • , Alan G. Ryder
  • , Yannick Casamayou-Boucau
  • , Cheryl Morris
  • University of Galway

Research output: Contribution to a Journal (Peer & Non Peer)Articlepeer-review

40 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A robust and accurate analytical methodology for low-content (<0.1%) quantification in the solid-state using Raman spectroscopy, subsampling, and chemometrics was demonstrated using a piracetam-proline model. The method involved a 5-step process: collection of a relatively large number of spectra (8410) from each sample by Raman mapping, meticulous data pretreatment to remove spectral artifacts, use of a 0-100% concentration range partial least-squares (PLS) regression model to estimate concentration at each pixel, use of a more accurate, reduced concentration range PLS model to calculate analyte concentration at each pixel, and finally statistical analysis of all 8000+ concentration predictions to produce an accurate overall sample concentration. The relative prediction accuracy was ∼2.4% for a 0.05-1.0% concentration range, and the limit of detection was comparable to high performance liquid chromatography (0.03% versus 0.041%). For data pretreatment, we developed a unique cosmic ray removal method and used an automated baseline correction method, neither of which required subjective user intervention and thus were fully automatable. The method is applicable to systems which cannot be easily analyzed chromatographically, such as hydrate, polymorph, or solvate contamination. (Graph Presented).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3419-3428
Number of pages10
JournalAnalytical Chemistry
Volume87
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 17 Mar 2015

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Low-Content Quantification in Powders Using Raman Spectroscopy: A Facile Chemometric Approach to Sub 0.1% Limits of Detection'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this