Laparotomy and laparoscopy differentially accelerate experimental flank tumour growth

M. L. Da Costa, H. P. Redmond, N. Finnegan, M. Flynn, D. Bouchier-Hayes

Research output: Contribution to a Journal (Peer & Non Peer)Articlepeer-review

103 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background. Surgery depresses host tumoricidal activity and may increase tumour growth. This study compared the effects of laparoscopy with laparotomy on extraperitoneal tumour growth and immune function in a murine model. Methods. C57BL/6 female mice aged 8-10 weeks had tumours induced in the right flank (n = 45) and were randomized to undergo halothane anaesthesia only, laparoscopy or laparotomy. Flank tumour volume was assessed over 10 days. A second group of animals (n = 540) were randomized to undergo the same procedures and killed at 24, 48 and 96 h. Splenocytes were harvested for natural-killer (NK) cell and lymphokine activated killer (LAK) cell cytotoxicity studies. Results. There was a significant increase in flank tumour growth in the first 48 h after laparotomy and laparoscopy compared with controls (P < 0.01). By 96 h the difference was only significant in the group (P < 0.01). Both NK and LAK cell cytotoxicities were suppressed significantly (P ≤ 0.03) from 24 h up to 96 h following laparotomy compared with control and laparoscopy groups. There was also a significant suppression in the laparoscopy group compared with controls in the first 48 h after operation (P ≤ 0.02). Conclusion. Extraperitoneal tumour growth was significantly accelerated after laparotomy and correlated with significantly suppressed NK and LAK cytotoxicity for at least 4 days after operation. Laparoscopy had a shorter, less profound effect on tumour growth and immune function.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1439-1442
Number of pages4
JournalBritish Journal of Surgery
Volume85
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1998
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Laparotomy and laparoscopy differentially accelerate experimental flank tumour growth'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this