Laïcité, gender equality and the politics of non-domination

The relationship between constitutional secularism and gender equality acquires peculiar dimensions in the context of the laïcité project in republican France - particularly, in the contemporary conflict between a laïcité interpreted as a politics of emancipatory social transformation, and the more minimalist liberal conception prevailing in French law. The dominant narrative in the republican establishment, shared between left and right, has been that laïcité will lead to gender emancipation not only by dissolving any sectarian dimensions of womens citizenship - that is, by sustaining a religiously neutral public sphere - but also, by preventing the domination as well as the coercion of religious choice in the intimate and private spheres of family and community. In this narrative, laïcité represents a more ambitious project of gender emancipation than that promised by the liberalisms more redolent of the Anglo-American world. The apogee of this expansionary interpretation of constitutional secularism is expressed in the 2004 prohibition on conspicuous markers of religious affiliation in the public schools, and the recent debate on the full Islamic veil. This article considers the relationship of laïcité to gender equality through the lens of the broader theoretical debate surrounding the relationship of political liberalism to the politics of non-domination. The elusive challenge is to craft a constitutional secularism that can sustain a viable politics of nondomination - going beyond the formalist voluntarism redolent of classical liberalisms, offering undominated as well as uncoerced religious choice - yet also avoiding an overzealous emancipatory stance that itself assumes a regulative role for womens religious choices.