TY - JOUR
T1 - Is the axiom of balloon angioplasty, “the more you gain the more you lose,” still true in the era of DCB with paclitaxel?
AU - Serruys, Patrick W.
AU - Tobe, Akihiro
AU - Ninomiya, Kai
AU - Garg, Scot
AU - Finn, Aloke V.
AU - Scheller, Bruno
AU - Cortese, Bernardo
AU - Colombo, Antonio
AU - Reimers, Bernhard
AU - Basavarajaiah, Sandeep
AU - Sharif, Faisal
AU - Fezzi, Simone
AU - Gao, Chao
AU - Tao, Ling
AU - Onuma, Yoshinobu
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2024/12
Y1 - 2024/12
N2 - Balloon angioplasty achieves luminal enlargement by fracturing the atherosclerotic intima at its point of least resistance, thereby creating a dissection plane and space with dehiscence of the intima from the media. This barotraumatic dissection triggers an inflammatory and proliferative reaction, resulting in a restenosis process at medium-term. In the era of plain old balloon angioplasty, quantitative angiographic studies at follow-up demonstrated that - the greater the acute luminal gain was after balloon angioplasty, the greater the late luminal loss was at follow-up. The interventional cardiologists coined the following motto “the more you gain, the more you lose”. However, in the current era of drug coated balloon (DCB), it appears that this vexing conundrum could have been abrogated. A recently published DCB study in small de novo vessel has demonstrated that there was a slightly negative correlation between the volume of dissection assessed by optical coherence tomography and the angiographic late luminal loss (now gain) after Paclitaxel coated balloon treatment. In other words, the barotraumatic dissection does not necessarily herald a restenosis process in the era of DCB. This article revisits the mechanism of balloon angioplasty and explores how DCB with Paclitaxel may change the paradigm of balloon angioplasty as default treatment in CAD percutaneous treatment.
AB - Balloon angioplasty achieves luminal enlargement by fracturing the atherosclerotic intima at its point of least resistance, thereby creating a dissection plane and space with dehiscence of the intima from the media. This barotraumatic dissection triggers an inflammatory and proliferative reaction, resulting in a restenosis process at medium-term. In the era of plain old balloon angioplasty, quantitative angiographic studies at follow-up demonstrated that - the greater the acute luminal gain was after balloon angioplasty, the greater the late luminal loss was at follow-up. The interventional cardiologists coined the following motto “the more you gain, the more you lose”. However, in the current era of drug coated balloon (DCB), it appears that this vexing conundrum could have been abrogated. A recently published DCB study in small de novo vessel has demonstrated that there was a slightly negative correlation between the volume of dissection assessed by optical coherence tomography and the angiographic late luminal loss (now gain) after Paclitaxel coated balloon treatment. In other words, the barotraumatic dissection does not necessarily herald a restenosis process in the era of DCB. This article revisits the mechanism of balloon angioplasty and explores how DCB with Paclitaxel may change the paradigm of balloon angioplasty as default treatment in CAD percutaneous treatment.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85191356953&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.carrev.2024.04.001
DO - 10.1016/j.carrev.2024.04.001
M3 - Review article
C2 - 38664133
AN - SCOPUS:85191356953
SN - 1553-8389
VL - 69
SP - 70
EP - 78
JO - Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine
JF - Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine
ER -