Is prediffusion test an alternative to improve accuracy in screening hVISA strains and to detect susceptibility to glycopeptides/lipopeptides?

Alessandro Conrado de Oliveira Silveira, Gustavo Enck Sambrano, Thiago Galvão da Silva Paim, Juliana Caierão, Caio Mauricio Mendes de Cordova, Pedro Alves d'Azevedo

Research output: Contribution to a Journal (Peer & Non Peer)Articlepeer-review

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The characterization of heteroresistant vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus strains (hVISA) is even more challenging, as no routine standardized laboratory methods are available. A total of 124 S. aureus isolates recovered from inpatients attended in hospitals of Santa Catarina State, Southern Brazil, were evaluated. The MIC of vancomycin, teicoplanin, and daptomycin was determined by Etest and prediffusion tests using NeoSensitabs® tablets. All isolates were susceptible to vancomycin (MICs: 0.5-3 μg/mL) by Etest. However, according to prediffusion test, 17 isolates presented reduced susceptibility to vancomycin, and of these, 12 were confirmed as hVISA using populational analysis. Considering daptomycin, prediffusion results were in agreement with susceptibility data (MICs), as all isolates were susceptible. Considering that characterizing hVISA is challenging and that MIC determination is not adequate to characterize this phenotype, prediffusion test was a viable alternative to screening hVISA and reduced susceptibility to vancomycin. It was simple and low cost, with accuracy comparable to other well-established methods.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)401-404
Number of pages4
JournalDiagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease
Volume79
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2014
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Heteroresistant vancomycin intermediate
  • MRSA
  • Staphylococcus aureus
  • Vancomycin resistance

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Is prediffusion test an alternative to improve accuracy in screening hVISA strains and to detect susceptibility to glycopeptides/lipopeptides?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this