Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Intravascular ultrasound guidance to minimize the use of iodine contrast in percutaneous coronary intervention the MOZART (minimizing contrast utilization with IVUS guidance in coronary angioplasty) randomized controlled trial

  • José Mariani
  • , Cristiano Guedes
  • , Paulo Soares
  • , Silvio Zalc
  • , Carlos M. Campos
  • , Augusto C. Lopes
  • , André G. Spadaro
  • , Marco A. Perin
  • , Antonio Esteves Filho
  • , Celso K. Takimura
  • , Expedito Ribeiro
  • , Roberto Kalil-Filho
  • , Elazer R. Edelman
  • , Patrick W. Serruys
  • , Pedro A. Lemos
  • University of São Paulo
  • Erasmus MC
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital
  • Imperial College London

Research output: Contribution to a Journal (Peer & Non Peer)Articlepeer-review

197 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guidance on the final volume of contrast agent used in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). BACKGROUND To date, few approaches have been described to reduce the final dose of contrast agent in PCIs. We hypothesized that IVUS might serve as an alternative imaging tool to angiography in many steps during PCI, thereby reducing the use of iodine contrast. METHODS A total of 83 patients were randomized to angiography-guided PCI or IVUS-guided PCI; both groups were treated according to a pre-defined meticulous procedural strategy. The primary endpoint was the total volume contrast agent used during PCI. Patients were followed clinically for an average of 4 months. RESULTS The median total volume of contrast was 64.5 ml (interquartile range [IQR]: 42.8 to 97.0 ml; minimum, 19 ml; maximum, 170 ml) in the angiography-guided group versus 20.0 ml (IQR: 12.5 to 30.0 ml; minimum, 3 ml; maximum, 54 ml) in the IVUS-guided group (p < 0.001). Similarly, the median volume of contrast/creatinine clearance ratio was significantly lower among patients treated with IVUS-guided PCI (1.0 [IQR: 0.6 to 1.9] vs. 0.4 [IQR: 0.2 to 0.6, respectively; p < 0.001). In-hospital and 4-month outcomes were not different between patients randomized to angiography-guided and IVUS-guided PCI. CONCLUSIONS Thoughtful and extensive use of IVUS as the primary imaging tool to guide PCI is safe and markedly reduces the volume of iodine contrast compared with angiography-alone guidance. The use of IVUS should be considered for patients at high risk of contrast-induced acute kidney injury or volume overload undergoing coronary angioplasty.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1287-1293
Number of pages7
JournalJACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
Volume7
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Contrast
  • Coronary intravascular ultrasound
  • Renal failure
  • Stent

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Intravascular ultrasound guidance to minimize the use of iodine contrast in percutaneous coronary intervention the MOZART (minimizing contrast utilization with IVUS guidance in coronary angioplasty) randomized controlled trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this