Abstract
Seven different types of radon detectors (Atmos 12 dpx, RAD7, RStone, Sun Nuclear 1028, Ramon 2.2, Canary and CR-39) were compared for exposure periods of 1, 2, 3 and 4 weeks. The comparison was conducted under two conditions: (a) in a purpose-built radon chamber with an average radon concentration of 2560 Bq m-3 (b) in a home environment with a radon concentration of 57 Bq m-3, in both cases measured by the reference detector (Atmos 12 dpx) with a ± 10% uncertainty range. In (a) 5 out of 8 detectors recorded radon concentrations within the Atmos uncertainty range and all detectors recorded within ± 15%; in (b) 3 out of 9 detectors recorded within the Atmos uncertainty range and 6 out of 9 measured within ± 20%, for a 4 week measurement. The results from this study show that radon surveys can be conducted for shorter periods than the recommended 3 months where a rapid indication is needed of whether the radon concentration is above the reference level, such as when assessing the concentration during and after remediation work.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 104-116 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | Journal of Radiological Protection |
| Volume | 36 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Mar 2016 |
Keywords
- CR-39
- continuous monitor
- detector
- radon