Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Integrated versus nOn-integrated Peripheral inTravenous catheter. Which Is the most effective systeM for peripheral intravenoUs catheter Management? (The OPTIMUM study): A randomised controlled trial protocol

  • Maria Isabel Castillo
  • , Emily Larsen
  • , Marie Cooke
  • , Nicole M. Marsh
  • , Marianne C. Wallis
  • , Julie Finucane
  • , Peter Brown
  • , Gabor Mihala
  • , Peter J. Carr
  • , Joshua Byrnes
  • , Rachel Walker
  • , Prudence Cable
  • , Li Zhang
  • , Candi Sear
  • , Gavin Jackson
  • , Anna Rowsome
  • , Alison Ryan
  • , Julie C. Humphries
  • , Susan Sivyer
  • , Kathy Flanigan
  • Claire M. Rickard
  • Griffith University
  • Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital
  • University of the Sunshine Coast
  • Queen Elizabeth II Jubilee Hospital
  • Fiona Stanley Hospital
  • Princess Alexandra Hospital

Research output: Contribution to a Journal (Peer & Non Peer)Articlepeer-review

15 Citations (Scopus)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Integrated versus nOn-integrated Peripheral inTravenous catheter. Which Is the most effective systeM for peripheral intravenoUs catheter Management? (The OPTIMUM study): A randomised controlled trial protocol'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
Sort by

Medicine and Dentistry

Nursing and Health Professions