Infection in chronic wounds: controversies in diagnosis and treatment.

G. Dow, A. Browne, R. G. Sibbald

Research output: Contribution to a Journal (Peer & Non Peer)Review articlepeer-review

201 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Chronic wounds all have bacterial contamination, which will not impair healing. Wound contamination must be distinguished from wound colonization and infection. Bacterial infection in wounds depends on the number of organisms present, their virulence, and host resistance. The most important indicators of infection are both local and systemic host characteristics and a holistic assessment of the patient. Several specimen collection and culture techniques are available to measure bacterial burden in the chronic wound. Advantages and disadvantages of each one discussed along with a rational approach to systemic antibiotic therapy. The presence of foreign material such as skin grafts or skin substitutes may lower the bacterial burden that may impair healing from 1.0 x 10(6) colony-forming units to 1.0 x 10(5) or less. The benefits of wound debridement, wound irrigation, and local nonantibiotic modes of treatment have been proven but the use of topical antibiotics and antiseptics requires further assessment. More widespread use of multiple nonantibiotic modalities of treatment for infected chronic wounds and rational antibiotic prescribing should reduce the risk of future antimicrobial resistance such as MRSA.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)23-27, 29
JournalOstomy/wound management
Volume45
Issue number8
Publication statusPublished - Aug 1999
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Infection in chronic wounds: controversies in diagnosis and treatment.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this