TY - JOUR
T1 - Inequitable mobilities
T2 - intersections of diversity with urban infrastructure influence mobility, health and wellbeing
AU - , on behalf of the Inclusive Streetscapes Project Team
AU - Spray, Julie
AU - Witten, Karen
AU - Wiles, Janine
AU - Anderson, Anneka
AU - Paul, Dolly
AU - Wade, Julie
AU - Ameratunga, Shanthi
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Transport infrastructure critically influences how people live their lives, structuring mobility and mediating access to the resources central to health and wellbeing. While the links between infrastructure, mobility and wellbeing are well established, much less is known about how these relationships are contingent on socio-economic, cultural, and bodily diversity, and the characteristics of local ecologies. Here, we firstly ask, how does transport infrastructure shape mobility opportunities for people living in diverse circumstances? Secondly, what are the impacts of inequitable access to mobility for wellbeing? Drawing from research across four sites in Tāmaki Makaurau (Auckland), Aotearoa New Zealand, we consider the experiences of older- and disabled- or bodily-diverse people from varied ethnic groups living across a range of socio-economic circumstances. We use community-based participatory research methods, including ‘go-along’ interviews, focus groups and interactive workshops, to engage communities least heard at policy or strategic levels. Their experiences illustrate firstly, that urban infrastructure tends to further marginalise the already marginalised, and secondly, that people draw on different and unequal resources to negotiate infrastructural marginalisation, resulting in unequally patterned vulnerabilities and a system that entrenches the status quo. Our findings indicate the need to consider intersectionality in transport consultation and design.
AB - Transport infrastructure critically influences how people live their lives, structuring mobility and mediating access to the resources central to health and wellbeing. While the links between infrastructure, mobility and wellbeing are well established, much less is known about how these relationships are contingent on socio-economic, cultural, and bodily diversity, and the characteristics of local ecologies. Here, we firstly ask, how does transport infrastructure shape mobility opportunities for people living in diverse circumstances? Secondly, what are the impacts of inequitable access to mobility for wellbeing? Drawing from research across four sites in Tāmaki Makaurau (Auckland), Aotearoa New Zealand, we consider the experiences of older- and disabled- or bodily-diverse people from varied ethnic groups living across a range of socio-economic circumstances. We use community-based participatory research methods, including ‘go-along’ interviews, focus groups and interactive workshops, to engage communities least heard at policy or strategic levels. Their experiences illustrate firstly, that urban infrastructure tends to further marginalise the already marginalised, and secondly, that people draw on different and unequal resources to negotiate infrastructural marginalisation, resulting in unequally patterned vulnerabilities and a system that entrenches the status quo. Our findings indicate the need to consider intersectionality in transport consultation and design.
KW - Wellbeing
KW - disability
KW - health
KW - older people
KW - transport infrastructure
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85126192490
U2 - 10.1080/23748834.2020.1827881
DO - 10.1080/23748834.2020.1827881
M3 - Article
SN - 2374-8834
VL - 6
SP - 711
EP - 725
JO - Cities and Health
JF - Cities and Health
IS - 4
ER -