In Defence of the Post-Work Future: Withdrawal and the Ludic Life

Research output: Chapter in Book or Conference Publication/ProceedingChapterpeer-review

Abstract

A basic income might be able to correct for the income related losses of unemployment, but what about the meaning purpose related losses? For better or worse, many people derive meaning and fulfillment from the jobs they do; if their jobs are taken away, they lose this source of meaning. If we are about the enter an era of rampant job loss as a result of advances in technology, is there a danger that it will also be an era of rampant meaninglessness? In this chapter, I offer counsel against any such despair. I argue that we should encourage the withdrawal from the world of work into a more personal world of games.We should do this because (a) work is structurally bad and getting worse as a result of technology; and (b) a more ludic, game-like life would help us to attain a valuable form of human flourishing. I offer three arguments in support of this view, and respond to critics who argue that withdrawing from the demands of work would result in a more selfish and impoverished form of existence.
Original languageEnglish (Ireland)
Title of host publicationThe Future of Work, Technology and Basic Income
PublisherRoutledge
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2019

Authors (Note for portal: view the doc link for the full list of authors)

  • Authors
  • Danaher, J.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'In Defence of the Post-Work Future: Withdrawal and the Ludic Life'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this