In Defence of the Hivemind Society

Research output: Contribution to a Journal (Peer & Non Peer)Articlepeer-review

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The idea that humans should abandon their individuality and use technology to bind themselves together into hivemind societies seems both farfetched and frightening - something that is redolent of the worst dystopias from science fiction. In this article, we argue that these common reactions to the ideal of a hivemind society are mistaken. The idea that humans could form hiveminds is sufficiently plausible for its axiological consequences to be taken seriously. Furthermore, far from being a dystopian nightmare, the hivemind society could be desirable and could enable a form of sentient flourishing. Consequently, we should not be so quick to deny it. We provide two arguments in support of this claim - the axiological openness argument and the desirability argument - and then defend it against three major objections.
Original languageEnglish (Ireland)
Pages (from-to)253-267
Number of pages15
JournalNeuroethics
Volume14
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2020

Keywords

  • AI Ethics
  • Axiology
  • Flourishing
  • Hiveminds
  • Identity
  • Individualism
  • Meaning
  • Mind
  • Personhood
  • Value

Authors (Note for portal: view the doc link for the full list of authors)

  • Authors
  • Danaher, J,Petersen, S

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'In Defence of the Hivemind Society'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this