Abstract
The idea that humans should abandon their individuality and use technology to bind themselves together into hivemind societies seems both farfetched and frightening - something that is redolent of the worst dystopias from science fiction. In this article, we argue that these common reactions to the ideal of a hivemind society are mistaken. The idea that humans could form hiveminds is sufficiently plausible for its axiological consequences to be taken seriously. Furthermore, far from being a dystopian nightmare, the hivemind society could be desirable and could enable a form of sentient flourishing. Consequently, we should not be so quick to deny it. We provide two arguments in support of this claim - the axiological openness argument and the desirability argument - and then defend it against three major objections.
| Original language | English (Ireland) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 253-267 |
| Number of pages | 15 |
| Journal | Neuroethics |
| Volume | 14 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Oct 2020 |
Keywords
- AI Ethics
- Axiology
- Flourishing
- Hiveminds
- Identity
- Individualism
- Meaning
- Mind
- Personhood
- Value
Authors (Note for portal: view the doc link for the full list of authors)
- Authors
- Danaher, J,Petersen, S