Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Impact of proton pump inhibitors on efficacy of antiplatelet strategies with ticagrelor or aspirin after percutaneous coronary intervention: Insights from the GLOBAL LEADERS trial

  • The GLOBAL LEADERS trial investigators
  • University of Amsterdam
  • University of Galway
  • Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center
  • Xijing Hospital
  • Hartcentrum Hasselt
  • University of Hasselt
  • Imelda Hospital
  • IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo
  • Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski Krakow University
  • Azienda Ospedaliera S. Maria di Terni
  • Wilhelminen Hospital
  • Medical University of Silesia
  • Royal Blackburn Hospital
  • University Medical Center Groningen
  • Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute
  • Justus-Liebig-University
  • University of Bern
  • Hasselt University
  • Cytosorbents Corporation
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital
  • University of Sheffield
  • Università della Svizzera Italiana (USI)
  • Imperial College London

Research output: Contribution to a Journal (Peer & Non Peer)Articlepeer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Several studies have suggested that proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) may reduce the antiplatelet effects of clopidogrel and/or aspirin, possibly leading to cardiovascular events. Aims: We aimed to investigate the association between PPI and clinical outcomes in patients treated with ticagrelor monotherapy or conventional antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods: This is a subanalysis of the randomized GLOBAL LEADERS trial, comparing the experimental antiplatelet arm (23-month ticagrelor monotherapy following 1-month dual antiplatelet therapy [DAPT]) with the reference arm (12-month aspirin monotherapy following 12-month DAPT) after PCI. Patient-oriented composite endpoints (POCEs: all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, or repeat revascularization) and its components were assessed stratified by PPI use as a time-dependent covariate in patients with the experiment or reference antiplatelet arm. Results: Among 15,839 patients, 2115 patients (13.5%) experienced POCE at 2 years. In the reference arm, the use of PPIs was independently associated with POCE (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.27; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.12–1.44) and its individual components, whereas it was not in the experimental arm (HR: 1.04; 95% CI: 0.92–1.19; pinteraction = 0.035). During the second-year follow-up, patients taking aspirin with PPIs had a significantly higher risk of POCE compared to those on aspirin without PPIs (HR: 1.57; 95% CI: 1.27–1.94), whereas the risk did not differ significantly irrespective of PPI in ticagrelor monotherapy group (HR: 1.03; 95% CI: 0.83–1.28; pinteraction = 0.008). Conclusions: In contrast to conventional antiplatelet strategy, there were no evidence suggesting the interaction between ticagrelor monotherapy and PPIs on increased cardiovascular events, which should be confirmed in further studies. Clinical Trial Registration: URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)72-82
Number of pages11
JournalCatheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
Volume100
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2022

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • drug interaction
  • dual antiplatelet therapy
  • percutaneous coronary intervention
  • proton pump inhibitor
  • ticagrelor monotherapy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Impact of proton pump inhibitors on efficacy of antiplatelet strategies with ticagrelor or aspirin after percutaneous coronary intervention: Insights from the GLOBAL LEADERS trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this