How many strains are required to set an epidemiological cut-off value for MIC values determined for bacteria isolated from aquatic animals?

Peter Smith, Göran Kronvall

Research output: Contribution to a Journal (Peer & Non Peer)Articlepeer-review

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Normalised resistance interpretation was applied to the estimation of epidemiological cut-off values from data sets that contained >150 observations from fully susceptible wild-type (WT) strains for six bacterial groups/antibiotic combinations. A series of 20 subsets containing 10, 20, 30 and 40 WT observations were randomly generated from these six larger data sets. The epidemiological cut-off values estimated using these 480 small data sets were compared with those estimated from their larger, parental data sets. Eighty-seven per cent of the 360 epidemiological cut-off values estimated from subsets that contained ≥20 WT observations were in agreement with those estimated from their respective larger sets. The remaining 13 % differed only by one doubling dilution. These calculations suggest that small strain sets can be used to set epidemiological cut-off values for MIC data without unacceptable loss of precision. It is concluded that the design of experiments intended to generate the data necessary to set epidemiological cut-off values should aim to include observations on at least 30 WT observations.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)465-470
Number of pages6
JournalAquaculture International
Volume23
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2015

Keywords

  • Antibiotic susceptibility
  • CLSI test protocols
  • Epidemiological cut-off values
  • M49-A
  • MIC
  • Precision
  • Sample size

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'How many strains are required to set an epidemiological cut-off value for MIC values determined for bacteria isolated from aquatic animals?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this