How informed is consent? Use of an information booklet in patients undergoing total hip replacement

S. R. Kearns, R. Kingston, S. Forman, P. Murray

Research output: Contribution to a Journal (Peer & Non Peer)Articlepeer-review

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

For informed consent, patients must understand the risks and benefits of the proposed procedure. Fifty patients undergoing total hip replacement (THR) participated in an evaluation of a newly devised information booklet. Patients' understanding of the risks and benefits of THR was assessed using a questionnaire before and after they had read the booklet. Pre-booklet patients knew on average 2 benefits of THR, compared with 3 afterwards. Twenty-two patients initially identified no alternative treatment to THR. Those who knew an alternative stated on average 1 treatment compared with 2 in the post-booklet group. Fifteen patients identified no risks of THR initially, compared with two after reading the booklet. Initially patients reported 1 risk, versus 3 after reading the booklet. Forty-eight patients thought that the booklet increased their understanding of THR and its risks. Fourteen found it upsetting, but acceptable. Forty-six patients wished to keep the booklet. This simple cost-effective intervention was acceptable to our patients and increased their understanding of the risks and benefits of THR.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)171-172
Number of pages2
JournalIrish Medical Journal
Volume94
Issue number6
Publication statusPublished - 2001
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'How informed is consent? Use of an information booklet in patients undergoing total hip replacement'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this