How does Post-traumatic Amnesia differ from the Amnesic Syndrome and from Chronic Memory Impairment?

  • Barbara A. Wilson
  • , Alan Baddeley

Research output: Contribution to a Journal (Peer & Non Peer)Articlepeer-review

34 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study compared memory and attention functioning in three groups of patients: those in post-traumatic amnesia (PTA), those with the amnesic syndrome (AS) and those with chronic memory impairment (CMI) following severe head injury, but who were no longer in PTA. We also tested a control group, most of whom had sustained orthopaedic injuries. Subjects were assessed on tests of immediate and delayed memory, semantic and episodic memory, procedural learning, speed of comprehension, and attention. Patients in PTA differed from all other groups on semantic processing (errors), verbal fluency (animals) and simple reaction time. The best measures for discriminating PTA were accuracy of comprehension, verbal fluency, delayed logical memory, simple reaction time, and backward digit span.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)231-243
Number of pages13
JournalNeuropsychological Rehabilitation
Volume2
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 1992
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'How does Post-traumatic Amnesia differ from the Amnesic Syndrome and from Chronic Memory Impairment?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this