Health literacy in women at risk of Gestational Diabetes

Research output: Contribution to a Journal (Peer & Non Peer)Articlepeer-review

Abstract

Aims or Objectives: To determine the prevalence of limited health literacy in pregnant women at risk of gestational diabetes(GDM). Additionally, this study aimed to describe demographic and pregnancy-related factors, including outcomes, in those with limited health literacy Methods: The study design was a single-centre, prospective observational one. Pregnant women at risk of GDM completed a demographic questionnaire and were interviewed. Two validated health literacy measures, namely, the Newest Vital Sign (NVS) and the EU Health Literacy Survey (HLS), were administered. Pregnancy outcomes were collected.Results: 297 pregnant women participated and GDM was diagnosed in 30 women (10.3%). Seventy #64257;ve women (25.3%) had limited functional health literacy and 113 women (38%) had limited general health literacy. Literacy was signi #64257;cantly associated with smoking, parental ethnic origin, type of health insurance and income. Women with limited health literacy were less likely to take pre-pregnancy folic acid, 53.5% vs 67.8%, than women with adequate health literacy (p 0.02). There were also less likely to breast feed, 60.6% vs 72.5% (p 0.001). This study found no association between health literacy and pregnancy outcomes.Conclusions or Summary: Limited health literacy is common among pregnant women at risk of GDM. Limited health literacy is associated with behavioural choices which can impact on neonatal and maternal health. Further studies are required to assess the impact of limited health literacy on pregnancy outcomes
Original languageEnglish (Ireland)
JournalDiabetic Medicine
Volume34
Issue numberS.1
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2017

Authors (Note for portal: view the doc link for the full list of authors)

  • Authors
  • Finn YF; Carmody L; Dunne F

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Health literacy in women at risk of Gestational Diabetes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this