Health economic analysis of a cluster-randomised trial (OptiBIRTH) designed to increase rates of vaginal birth after caesarean section

M. Fobelets, K. Beeckman, P. Healy, S. Grylka-Baeschlin, J. Nicoletti, D. Devane, M. M. Gross, S. Morano, D. Daly, C. Begley, K. Putman

Research output: Contribution to a Journal (Peer & Non Peer)Articlepeer-review

Abstract

Objective: To perform a health economic analysis of an intervention designed to increase rates of vaginal birth after caesarean, compared with usual care. Design: Economic analysis alongside the cluster-randomised OptiBIRTH trial (Optimising childbirth by increasing vaginal birth after caesarean section (VBAC) through enhanced women-centred care). Setting: Fifteen maternity units in three European countries – Germany (five), Ireland (five), and Italy (five) – with relatively low VBAC rates. Population: Pregnant women with a history of one previous lower-segment caesarean section; sites were randomised (3:2) to intervention or control. Methods: A cost–utility analysis from both societal and health-services perspectives, using a decision tree. Main outcome measures: Costs and resource use per woman and infant were compared between the control and intervention group by country, from pregnancy recognition until 3 months postpartum. Based on the caesarean section rates, and maternal and neonatal morbidities and mortality, the incremental cost–utility ratios were calculated per country. Results: The mean difference in costs per quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained from a societal perspective between the intervention and the control group, using a probabilistic sensitivity analysis, was: €263 (95% CI €258–268) and 0.008 QALYs (95% CI 0.008–0.009 QALYs) for Germany, €456 (95% CI €448–464) and 0.052 QALYs (95% CI 0.051–0.053 QALYs) for Ireland, and €1174 (95% CI €1170–1178) and 0.006 QALYs (95% CI 0.005–0.007 QALYs) for Italy. The incremental cost–utility ratios were €33,741/QALY for Germany, €8785/QALY for Ireland, and €214,318/QALY for Italy, with a 51% probability of being cost-effective for Germany, 92% for Ireland, and 15% for Italy. Conclusion: The OptiBIRTH intervention was likely to be cost-effective in Ireland and Germany. Tweetable abstract: The OptiBIRTH intervention (to increase VBAC rates) is likely to be cost-effective in Germany and Ireland.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1043-1051
Number of pages9
JournalBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Volume126
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2019

Keywords

  • Cost-effectiveness analysis
  • elective repeat caesarean
  • quality of life
  • vaginal birth after caesarean

Authors (Note for portal: view the doc link for the full list of authors)

  • Authors
  • Fobelets, M. and Beeckman, K. and Healy, P. and Grylka-Baeschlin, S. and Nicoletti, J. and Devane, D. and Gross, M.M. and Morano, S. and Daly, D. and Begley, C. and Putman, K.
  • Fobelets, M;Beeckman, K;Healy, P;Grylka-Baeschlin, S;Nicoletti, J;Devane, D;Gross, MM;Morano, S;Daly, D;Begley, C;Putman, K

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Health economic analysis of a cluster-randomised trial (OptiBIRTH) designed to increase rates of vaginal birth after caesarean section'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this