GRADE Certainty Ratings: Thresholds Rather Than Categories of Contextualization (GRADE Guidance 41)

  • Monica Hultcrantz
  • , Holger J. Schünemann
  • , Reem A. Mustafa
  • , David M. Rind
  • , M. Hassan Murad
  • , Martin Mayer
  • , David Tovey
  • , Brian S. Alper
  • , Elie A. Akl
  • , K. M. Saif-Ur-Rahman
  • , Bernardo Sousa-Pinto
  • , Ignacio Neumann
  • , Ariel Izcovich
  • , Gordon Guyatt

    Research output: Contribution to a Journal (Peer & Non Peer)Articlepeer-review

    4 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    In 2017, the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) working group defined the certainty of evidence as the certainty that the true effect lies on one side of a threshold or in a particular range. This definition has proved useful as the basis for rating certainty, facilitating the interpretation of the results for the target audience. However, the categorization of suggested thresholds and ranges as levels of contextualization led to inconsistencies between the initial and subsequent papers and has proved confusing for some GRADE users. Although considering context in choosing thresholds remains worthwhile, the GRADE working group will no longer use the categorization of contextualization. It will instead refer simply to chosen thresholds or ranges for determining the target of certainty rating.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1183-1186
    Number of pages4
    JournalAnnals of Internal Medicine
    Volume178
    Issue number8
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2025

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'GRADE Certainty Ratings: Thresholds Rather Than Categories of Contextualization (GRADE Guidance 41)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this