Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Good practice in mental health care for socially marginalised groups in Europe: A qualitative study of expert views in 14 countries

  • Stefan Priebe
  • , Aleksandra Matanov
  • , Ruth Schor
  • , Christa Straßmayr
  • , Henrique Barros
  • , Margaret M. Barry
  • , José Manuel Díaz-Olalla
  • , Edina Gabor
  • , Tim Greacen
  • , Petra Holcnerová
  • , Ulrike Kluge
  • , Vincent Lorant
  • , Jacek Moskalewicz
  • , Aart H Schene
  • , Gloria Macassa
  • , Andrea Gaddini
  • Queen Mary University of London
  • Ludwig Boltzmann Institute
  • University of Porto
  • Madrid Salud
  • National Institute for Health Development
  • Etablissement Public de Santé Maison Blanche
  • Charles University
  • Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin
  • Université Catholique de Louvain
  • Institute of Psychiatry and Neurology, Warszawa
  • University of Amsterdam
  • Karolinska Institutet
  • Laziosanit ASP - Public Health Agency

Research output: Contribution to a Journal (Peer & Non Peer) › Article › peer-review

72 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Socially marginalised groups tend to have higher rates of mental disorders than the general population and can be difficult to engage in health care. Providing mental health care for these groups represents a particular challenge, and evidence on good practice is required. This study explored the experiences and views of experts in 14 European countries regarding mental health care for six socially marginalised groups: long-term unemployed; street sex workers; homeless; refugees/asylum seekers; irregular migrants and members of the travelling communities. Methods. Two highly deprived areas were selected in the capital cities of 14 countries, and experts were interviewed for each of the six marginalised groups. Semi-structured interviews with case vignettes were conducted to explore experiences of good practice and analysed using thematic analysis. Results: In a total of 154 interviews, four components of good practice were identified across all six groups: a) establishing outreach programmes to identify and engage with individuals with mental disorders; b) facilitating access to services that provide different aspects of health care, including mental health care, and thus reducing the need for further referrals; c) strengthening the collaboration and co-ordination between different services; and d) disseminating information on services both to marginalised groups and to practitioners in the area. Conclusions: Experts across Europe hold similar views on what constitutes good practice in mental health care for marginalised groups. Care may be improved through better service organisation, coordination and information.

Original languageEnglish
Article number248
JournalBMC public health
Volume12
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 10 - Reduced Inequalities
    SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities

Keywords

  • Autonomy
  • Externally hosted open access publications with University of Galway authors
  • Good practice
  • Health care systems
  • homeless
  • Marginalisation
  • Mental health care
  • meta-regression
  • migrants
  • people
  • prevalence
  • professionals
  • western countries

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Good practice in mental health care for socially marginalised groups in Europe: A qualitative study of expert views in 14 countries'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this