Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Generative AI entails a credit–blame asymmetry

  • Sebastian Porsdam Mann
  • , Brian D. Earp
  • , Sven Nyholm
  • , John Danaher
  • , Nikolaj Møller
  • , Hilary Bowman-Smart
  • , Joshua Hatherley
  • , Julian Koplin
  • , Monika Plozza
  • , Daniel Rodger
  • , Peter V. Treit
  • , Gregory Renard
  • , John McMillan
  • , Julian Savulescu
  • University of Oxford
  • University of Oxford
  • Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich
  • University of Oxford Medical Sciences Division
  • Monash University
  • University of Lucerne
  • South Bank University
  • Birkbeck University UK
  • Max-Planck-Institute of Biochemistry
  • Applied AI Corporation
  • Marshall Space Flight Control Center
  • University of California Berkeley
  • University of Otago
  • National University of Singapore

Research output: Contribution to a Journal (Peer & Non Peer) › Comment/debate

68 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Generative AI programs can produce high-quality written and visual content that may be used for good or ill. We argue that a creditblame asymmetry arises for assigning responsibility for these outputs and discuss urgent ethical and policy implications focused on large-scale language models.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)472-475
Number of pages4
JournalNature Machine Intelligence
Volume5
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2023

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Generative AI entails a credit–blame asymmetry'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this