Foucault and Power: A Critique and Retheorization

Mark Haugaard

    Research output: Contribution to a Journal (Peer & Non Peer)Articlepeer-review

    24 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    From the perspective of sociological theory, Foucault’s concepts of power, power-knowledge, and discipline are one-sided. While Foucault contends that there is no center of power, his account of power remains top-down or structural, missing the interactive and enabling aspects of power. A more balanced view would suggest that all exercises of power include meaningful agency (the ability to do something); social structures (not simply as constraints but as interactive creations); social knowledge (including both reifying truth claims and enabling truth or knowledge); and social-ontological being-in-the-social-world (both as enabling and dominating).

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)341-371
    Number of pages31
    JournalCritical Review
    Volume34
    Issue number3-4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2022

    Keywords

    • agency
    • domination
    • Foucault
    • power
    • structure

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Foucault and Power: A Critique and Retheorization'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this