Abstract
From the perspective of sociological theory, Foucault’s concepts of power, power-knowledge, and discipline are one-sided. While Foucault contends that there is no center of power, his account of power remains top-down or structural, missing the interactive and enabling aspects of power. A more balanced view would suggest that all exercises of power include meaningful agency (the ability to do something); social structures (not simply as constraints but as interactive creations); social knowledge (including both reifying truth claims and enabling truth or knowledge); and social-ontological being-in-the-social-world (both as enabling and dominating).
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 341-371 |
| Number of pages | 31 |
| Journal | Critical Review |
| Volume | 34 |
| Issue number | 3-4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2022 |
Keywords
- agency
- domination
- Foucault
- power
- structure