Forward and back aspiration during ST-elevation myocardial infarction: A feasibility study

Vasim Farooq, Patrick W. Serruys, Ahmad H.S. Mustafa, Mamas A. Mamas, Nadim Malik, Hafez A. Alhous, Magdi El-Omar, Cara Hendry, Durgesh N. Rana, David Shelton, Paul K. Wright, Nadira Narine, Bernard Clarke, Bernard Keavney, Farzin Fath-Ordoubadi, Douglas G. Fraser

Research output: Contribution to a Journal (Peer & Non Peer)Articlepeer-review

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aims: The inability to optimise stent expansion fully whilst simultaneously preventing distal embolisation during ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) remains a clinical conundrum. We aimed to describe a newly devised angiographic strategy of "forward" and "back" aspiration that leads to more complete thrombus removal and prevention of distal embolisation, to allow high-pressure post-dilatation of the implanted stent to be performed. Methods and results: Forward aspiration was conducted with a conventional aspiration thrombectomy catheter, with bail-out aspiration thrombectomy for angiographically persistent thrombus utilising the larger bore 6 Fr (0.056″) guide catheter extension system (GuideLiner® ; Vascular Solutions, Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA). Back aspiration was undertaken with a deeply intubated GuideLiner or guide catheter with a vacuum induced within, extending to the inflated angioplasty balloon, to allow for proximal embolic protection during balloon deflation during all stages of the PCI procedure, including high-pressure post-dilatation of the stent to the visually estimated reference vessel diameter (RVD). Over a six-month period 30 consecutive cases were undertaken during working hours. Bail-out GuideLiner-assisted aspiration thrombectomy was performed in 9/30 cases because of inadequate thrombus removal with a conventional aspiration thrombectomy catheter. Back aspiration was performed in all cases. In 27/30 cases high-pressure post-dilatation of the stent was performed. The mean maximum post-dilatation balloon size and mean proximal reference vessel diameter did not significantly differ (3.60±0.41 mm vs. 3.65±0.45 mm, p=0.68). In all cases, implantation +/- post-dilatation of the stent to the visually estimated RVD was achievable without any deterioration in TIMI blood flow or myocardial blush grade. Conclusions: The strategy of forward and back aspiration to facilitate stent implantation and high-pressure post-dilatation during STEMI appears to be safe and effective. Randomised controlled trials are required to confirm the safety and efficacy of this newly devised angiographic strategy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)e1639-e1648
JournalEuroIntervention
Volume11
Issue number14
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2016
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Aspiration thrombectomy
  • Back aspiration
  • Distal embolisation
  • Forward aspiration
  • Incomplete stent apposition
  • ST-elevation myocardial infarction
  • Stent thrombosis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Forward and back aspiration during ST-elevation myocardial infarction: A feasibility study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this