Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Forward and back aspiration during ST-elevation myocardial infarction: A feasibility study

  • Vasim Farooq
  • , Patrick W. Serruys
  • , Ahmad H.S. Mustafa
  • , Mamas A. Mamas
  • , Nadim Malik
  • , Hafez A. Alhous
  • , Magdi El-Omar
  • , Cara Hendry
  • , Durgesh N. Rana
  • , David Shelton
  • , Paul K. Wright
  • , Nadira Narine
  • , Bernard Clarke
  • , Bernard Keavney
  • , Farzin Fath-Ordoubadi
  • , Douglas G. Fraser
  • University of Manchester
  • Erasmus University Rotterdam
  • Imperial College London
  • Keele University
  • University Hospital of South Manchester

Research output: Contribution to a Journal (Peer & Non Peer) › Article › peer-review

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aims: The inability to optimise stent expansion fully whilst simultaneously preventing distal embolisation during ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) remains a clinical conundrum. We aimed to describe a newly devised angiographic strategy of "forward" and "back" aspiration that leads to more complete thrombus removal and prevention of distal embolisation, to allow high-pressure post-dilatation of the implanted stent to be performed. Methods and results: Forward aspiration was conducted with a conventional aspiration thrombectomy catheter, with bail-out aspiration thrombectomy for angiographically persistent thrombus utilising the larger bore 6 Fr (0.056″) guide catheter extension system (GuideLiner® ; Vascular Solutions, Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA). Back aspiration was undertaken with a deeply intubated GuideLiner or guide catheter with a vacuum induced within, extending to the inflated angioplasty balloon, to allow for proximal embolic protection during balloon deflation during all stages of the PCI procedure, including high-pressure post-dilatation of the stent to the visually estimated reference vessel diameter (RVD). Over a six-month period 30 consecutive cases were undertaken during working hours. Bail-out GuideLiner-assisted aspiration thrombectomy was performed in 9/30 cases because of inadequate thrombus removal with a conventional aspiration thrombectomy catheter. Back aspiration was performed in all cases. In 27/30 cases high-pressure post-dilatation of the stent was performed. The mean maximum post-dilatation balloon size and mean proximal reference vessel diameter did not significantly differ (3.60±0.41 mm vs. 3.65±0.45 mm, p=0.68). In all cases, implantation +/- post-dilatation of the stent to the visually estimated RVD was achievable without any deterioration in TIMI blood flow or myocardial blush grade. Conclusions: The strategy of forward and back aspiration to facilitate stent implantation and high-pressure post-dilatation during STEMI appears to be safe and effective. Randomised controlled trials are required to confirm the safety and efficacy of this newly devised angiographic strategy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)e1639-e1648
JournalEuroIntervention
Volume11
Issue number14
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2016
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Aspiration thrombectomy
  • Back aspiration
  • Distal embolisation
  • Forward aspiration
  • Incomplete stent apposition
  • ST-elevation myocardial infarction
  • Stent thrombosis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Forward and back aspiration during ST-elevation myocardial infarction: A feasibility study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this