Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Five-year outcomes after coronary stenting versus bypass surgery for the treatment of multivessel disease: The final analysis of the arterial revascularization therapies study (ARTS) randomized trial

  • Patrick W. Serruys
  • , Andrew T.L. Ong
  • , Lex A. Van Herwerden
  • , J. Eduardo Sousa
  • , Adib Jatene
  • , Johannes J.R.M. Bonnier
  • , Jacques P.M.A. Schönberger
  • , Nigel Buller
  • , Robert Bonser
  • , Clemens Disco
  • , Bianca Backx
  • , Paul G. Hugenholtz
  • , Brian G. Firth
  • , Felix Unger
  • Erasmus MC
  • Dante Pazzanese Institute of Cardiology
  • Hospital Do Coracao
  • Catharina Hospital
  • Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham
  • Cardialysis BV
  • Johnson and Johnson, Inc NJ
  • Landeskliniken

Research output: Contribution to a Journal (Peer & Non Peer)Articlepeer-review

587 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The long-term (five-year) comparative results of treatment of multivessel coronary artery disease with stenting or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is at present unknown. BACKGROUND: The Arterial Revascularization Therapies Study (ARTS) was designed to compare CABG and stenting in patients with multivessel disease. METHODS: A total of 1,205 patients with the potential for equivalent revascularization were randomly assigned to CABG (n = 605) or stent implantation (n = 600). The primary clinical end point was freedom from major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) at one year; MACCE at five-year follow-up constituted the final secondary end point. RESULTS: At five years, there were 48 and 46 deaths in the stent and CABG groups, respectively (8.0% vs. 7.6%; p = 0.83; relative risk [RR], 1.05; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.71 to 1.55). Among 208 diabetic patients, mortality was 13.4% in the stent group and 8.3% in the CABG group (p = 0.27; RR, 1.61; 95% CI, 0.71 to 3.63). Overall freedom from death, stroke, or myocardial infarction was not significantly different between groups (18.2% in the stent group vs. 14.9% in the surgical group; p = 0.14; RR, 1.22; 95% CI, 0.95 to 1.58). The incidence of repeat revascularization was significantly higher in the stent group (30.3%) than in the CABG group (8.8%; p < 0.001; RR, 3.46;95% CI, 2.61 to 4.60). The composite event-free survival rate was 58.3% in the stent group and 78.2% in the CABG group (p < 0.0001; RR, 1.91;95% CI, 1.60 to 2.28). CONCLUSIONS: At five years there was no difference in mortality between stenting and surgery for multivessel disease. Furthermore, the incidence of stroke or myocardial infarction was not significantly different between the two groups. However, overall MACCE was higher in the stent group, driven by the increased need for repeat revascularization.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)575-581
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of the American College of Cardiology
Volume46
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 16 Aug 2005
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Five-year outcomes after coronary stenting versus bypass surgery for the treatment of multivessel disease: The final analysis of the arterial revascularization therapies study (ARTS) randomized trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this