Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

First generation versus second generation drug-eluting stents for the treatment of bifurcations: 5-year follow-up of the LEADERS all-comers randomized trial

  • Maik J. Grundeken
  • , Joanna J. Wykrzykowska
  • , Yuki Ishibashi
  • , Scot Garg
  • , Ton de Vries
  • , Hector M. Garcia-Garcia
  • , Yoshinobu Onuma
  • , Robbert J. de Winter
  • , Pawel Buszman
  • , Axel Linke
  • , Thomas Ischinger
  • , Volker Klauss
  • , Franz Eberli
  • , Roberto Corti
  • , William Wijns
  • , Marie Claude Morice
  • , Carlo di Mario
  • , Bernhard Meier
  • , Peter Jüni
  • , Ashkan Yazdani
  • Samuel Copt, Stephan Windecker, Patrick W. Serruys
  • Academic Medical Center
  • Erasmus MC
  • East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust
  • Cardialysis BV
  • American Heart of Poland
  • Heart Centre Leipzig
  • Kardiologie im Zentrum
  • Kardiologie Innenstadt
  • Stadtspital Triemli
  • University Hospital Zürich
  • OLV Hospital
  • Institut Hospitalier Jacques Cartier
  • Royal Brompton Hospital
  • University of Bern
  • Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine
  • Biosensors Europe SA
  • Imperial College London

Research output: Contribution to a Journal (Peer & Non Peer)Articlepeer-review

54 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Historically, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of bifurcation lesions was associated with worse procedural and clinical outcomes when compared with PCI of non-bifurcation lesions. Newer generation drug-eluting stents (DES) might improve long-term clinical outcomes after bifurcation PCI. Methods and Results: The LEADERS trial was a 10-center, assessor-blind, non-inferiority, all-comers trial, randomizing 1,707 patients to treatment with a biolimus A9TM-eluting stent (BES) with an abluminal biodegradable polymer or a sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) with a durable polymer (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00389220). Five-year clinical outcomes were compared between patients with and without bifurcation lesions and between BES and SES in the bifurcation lesion subgroup. There were 497 (29%) patients with at least 1 bifurcation lesion (BES = 258; SES = 239). At 5-year follow-up, the composite endpoint of cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI) and clinically-indicated (CI) target vessel revascularization (TVR) was observed more frequently in the bifurcation group (26.6% vs. 22.4%, P = 0.049). Within the bifurcation lesion subgroup, no differences were observed in (cardiac) death or MI rates between BES and SES. However, CI target lesion revascularization (TLR) (10.1% vs. 15.9%, P = 0.0495), and CI TVR (12.0% vs. 19.2%, P = 0.023) rates were significantly lower in the BES group. Definite/probable stent thrombosis (ST) rate was numerically lower in the BES group (3.1% vs. 5.9%, P = 0.15). Very late (>1 year) definite/probable ST rates trended to be lower with BES (0.4% vs. 3.1%, P = 0.057). Conclusions: In the treatment of bifurcation lesions, use of BES led to superior long-term efficacy compared with SES. Safety outcomes were comparable between BES and SES, with an observed trend toward a lower rate of very late definite/probable ST between 1 and 5 years with the BES.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)248-260
Number of pages13
JournalCatheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
Volume87
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2016
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • clinical trials (CLIN)
  • coronary artery disease (CAD)
  • percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)
  • percutaneous coronary intervention complex (PCIC)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'First generation versus second generation drug-eluting stents for the treatment of bifurcations: 5-year follow-up of the LEADERS all-comers randomized trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this