Exploring the accuracy of smartphone applications for measuring environmental noise

Enda Murphy, Eoin A. King, Sean Rahusen, Jake Schpero, Lane Millar

Research output: Contribution to conference (Published)Paperpeer-review

Abstract

This paper reports on experimental tests undertaken to assess the capability of noise monitoring apps on smartphones to be utilised as an alternative low cost solution to traditional noise monitoring using a sound level meter. The methodology consisted of testing more than 100 smartphones in a reverberation room. White noise was utilised to test the ability of smartphones to measure noise at background, 50, 70 and 90 dB(A) and these measurements were compared with true noise levels acquired via a calibrated sound level meter. Tests were conducted on phones using the Android and iOS platforms. For each smartphone, tests were completed separately for three leading noise monitoring apps culminating in more than 1400 tests. The results suggest that apps written for the iOS platform are superior to those running on the Android platform which, in relative terms, performed rather poorly. For one of the iOS noise apps, the test results were within 1 dB(A) of the true noise level indicating the clear potential of the iPhone to be used as a low cost monitoring device in the future. The research has implications for the future use of smartphones as low cost monitoring and assessment devices for environmental noise.

Original languageEnglish
Publication statusPublished - 2015
Externally publishedYes
Event44th International Congress and Exposition on Noise Control Engineering, INTER-NOISE 2015 - San Francisco, United States
Duration: 9 Aug 201512 Aug 2015

Conference

Conference44th International Congress and Exposition on Noise Control Engineering, INTER-NOISE 2015
Country/TerritoryUnited States
CitySan Francisco
Period9/08/1512/08/15

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Exploring the accuracy of smartphone applications for measuring environmental noise'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this