Abstract
CFD evaluations were performed to examine the applicability of the RANS methods in simulating pollutant dispersion near, within and over three typical building configurations: (1) an isolated building, (2) a building array and (3) an urban intersection. The CFD results are compared with values obtained from wind tunnel tests. In some situations major differences between the wind tunnel tests and the CFD results were observed. The main source of difference between the CFD and wind tunnel results was inadequate modelling of local flow patterns using the RANS turbulence models. Also inappropriate evaluation of high intermittent turbulent mixing in the RANS approach may lead to either over-prediction or under-prediction of the concentration level, by up to a factor of 10, depending on the case investigated.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 181-202 |
| Number of pages | 22 |
| Journal | Environmental Fluid Mechanics |
| Volume | 6 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Apr 2006 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 11 Sustainable Cities and Communities
Keywords
- Building effects
- CFD evaluation
- Pollutant dispersion
- RANS methods
- Wind tunnel experiment
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluation of CFD simulation using RANS turbulence models for building effects on pollutant dispersion'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver