Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Evaluating the oncological safety of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced colon carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials and propensity-matched studies

  • Matthew G. Davey
  • , Amira H. Amir
  • , Odhrán K. Ryan
  • , Mark Donnelly
  • , Noel E. Donlon
  • , Mark Regan
  • , Babak Meshkat
  • , Emmeline Nugent
  • , Myles Joyce
  • , Aisling M. Hogan
  • Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland
  • Galway University Hospital

Research output: Contribution to a Journal (Peer & Non Peer)Review articlepeer-review

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for locally advanced colon cancer (LACC) remains controversial. An integrated analysis of data from high-quality studies may inform the long-term safety of NAC for this cohort. Our aim was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials (RCTs) and propensity-matched studies to assess the oncological safety of NAC in patients with LACC. Methods: A systematic review was performed as per preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Survival was expressed as hazard ratios using time-to-effect generic inverse variance methodology, while surgical outcomes were expressed as odds ratios (ORs) using the Mantel-Haenszel method. Data analysis was performed using Review Manager version 5.4. Results: Eight studies (4 RCTs and 4 retrospective studies) including 31,047 patients with LACC were included. Mean age was 61.0 years (range: 19–93 years) and mean follow-up was 47.6 months (range: 2–133 months). Of those receiving NAC, 4.6% achieved a pathological complete response and 90.6% achieved R0 resection (versus 85.9%, P < 0.001). At 3 years, patients receiving NAC had improved disease-free survival (DFS) (OR: 1.28, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.02–1.60, P = 0.030) and overall survival (OS) (OR: 1.76, 95% CI: 1.10–2.81, P = 0.020). When using time-to-effect modelling, a non-significant difference was observed for DFS (HR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.57–1.09, P = 0.150) while a significant difference in favour of NAC was observed for OS (HR: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.58–0.98, P = 0.030). Conclusion: This study highlights the oncological safety of NAC for patients being treated with curative intent for LACC using RCT and propensity-matched studies only. These results refute current management guidelines which do not advocate for NAC to improve surgical and oncological outcomes in patients with LACC. Trial registration: InternationalProspective Register of Systematic Review (PROSPERO) registration: CRD4202341723.

Original languageEnglish
Article number193
JournalInternational Journal of Colorectal Disease
Volume38
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2023
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Colon cancer
  • Neoadjuvant therapies
  • Personalised medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluating the oncological safety of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced colon carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials and propensity-matched studies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this