EU Competition Law Devours Its Children: The Proliferation of Anti-Competitive Object and the Problem of False Positives

Research output: Contribution to a Journal (Peer & Non Peer)Articlepeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In the last decade, EU competition law reached a major turning point in its history. Anti-competitive object became an elusive and unpredictable rule, which boosts the risk of false positives and has a significant chilling effect. This article analyses this metamorphosis and the social damages it is causing, and proposes an alternative conception. The article demonstrates that the emerging new concept of anti-competitive object erroneously conflates 'contextual analysis', which has been part of the objectinquiry from the outset, and 'effects-analysis', which has no role to play here. It submits that both doctrinal and policy reasons confirm that anti-competitive object should be a category-building principle of 'judicial rule-making' ('definition of the definition') and not applicable to individual arrangements directly.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)290-310
Number of pages21
JournalCambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies
Volume23
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 7 Dec 2021
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Anti-competitive effect
  • Anti-competitive object
  • Competition analysis
  • Effects analysis
  • EU competition law
  • Per se illegality
  • Rule of reason
  • US antitrust law

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'EU Competition Law Devours Its Children: The Proliferation of Anti-Competitive Object and the Problem of False Positives'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this