Abstract
In the last decade, EU competition law reached a major turning point in its history. Anti-competitive object became an elusive and unpredictable rule, which boosts the risk of false positives and has a significant chilling effect. This article analyses this metamorphosis and the social damages it is causing, and proposes an alternative conception. The article demonstrates that the emerging new concept of anti-competitive object erroneously conflates 'contextual analysis', which has been part of the objectinquiry from the outset, and 'effects-analysis', which has no role to play here. It submits that both doctrinal and policy reasons confirm that anti-competitive object should be a category-building principle of 'judicial rule-making' ('definition of the definition') and not applicable to individual arrangements directly.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 290-310 |
| Number of pages | 21 |
| Journal | Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies |
| Volume | 23 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 7 Dec 2021 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Anti-competitive effect
- Anti-competitive object
- Competition analysis
- Effects analysis
- EU competition law
- Per se illegality
- Rule of reason
- US antitrust law