Endometrial development in the luteal phase of women with various types of infertility: Comparison with women of normal fertility

Research output: Contribution to a Journal (Peer & Non Peer)Articlepeer-review

46 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this study, the prevalence of retarded endometrial development in the luteal phase of an infertile population (20/142=14%) was found to be significantly higher (P<0.05) than in that of a control, fertile populatIon (3/68=4.4%). However, when the infertile subjects were subdivided into groups of different aetlology, it was found that women with endometriosis and unexplained Infertility had a significantly higher prevalence of retarded endometrium (6/21=29%, 10/48=21% respectively; P<0.01 in both cases) than women with normal fertility; whereas the prevalence in women with tubal or male infertilIty (1/34=2.9% and 3/39=7.7%, respectively) was not significantly different from that in the fertile subjects. There were no significant differences in the progesterone profiles of the four groups of infertile subjects and the group of fertile subjects. Of the 15 cases of retarded endometrial development with known progesterone profile, two were associated with subnormal progesterone whereas the remaining 13 were associated with normal progesterone, the lauer suggesting an abnormal response of the endometrium to a normal amount of progesterone. The findings suggest that further morphological study of the endometrium should be aimed at subjects whose infertility is unexplained or associated with endometriosis, in whom the prevalence of abnormal endometrium is increased.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)325-330
Number of pages6
JournalHuman Reproduction
Volume6
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 1991
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Endometrial development
  • Female infertility

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Endometrial development in the luteal phase of women with various types of infertility: Comparison with women of normal fertility'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this