Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Emotional see-saw affects rationality of decision-making: Evidence for metacognitive impairments

  • Michał Folwarczny
  • , Magdalena C. Kaczmarek
  • , Dariusz Doliński
  • , Remigiusz Szczepanowski
  • SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities
  • Friedrich Schiller University Jena
  • University of Lower Silesia

Research output: Contribution to a Journal (Peer & Non Peer)Articlepeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This research investigated the cognitive mechanisms that underlie impairments in human reasoning triggered by the emotional see-saw technique. It has previously been stated that such manipulation is effective as it presumably induces a mindless state and cognitive deficits in compliant individuals. Based on the dual-system architecture of reasoning (system 2) and affective decision-making (system 1), we challenged the previous theoretical account by indicating that the main source of compliance is impairment of the meta-reasoning system when rapid affective changes occur. To examine this hypothesis, we manipulated affective feelings (system 1 processing) by violating participants' expectations regarding reward and performance in a go/no-go task in which individuals were to inhibit their responses to earn money. Aside from the go/no-go performance, we measured rationality (meta-reasoning system 2) in decision-making by asking participants to comply with a nonsensical request. We found that participants who were exposed to meta-reasoning impairments due to the emotional see-saw phenomenon exhibited mindless behavior.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)126-132
Number of pages7
JournalActa Psychologica
Volume186
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2018
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Decision-making
  • Emotional see-saw
  • Meta-reasoning
  • Social influence

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Emotional see-saw affects rationality of decision-making: Evidence for metacognitive impairments'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this